with my pc could i play ?

[abel.graficos]

Windows 11 Home 64-bit
12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12400F (12 CPUs), ~2.5GHz
16384MB RAM
DirectX 12
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz) HDMI

[Deadmeat]

Yes you can. I did multiple play throughs on a 1060 without issues. You just need to adjust video settings to match what your card can handle.

[[S.A.S]sephchan]

ye

[abel.graficos]

Originally posted by Deadmeat:

Yes you can. I did multiple play throughs on a 1060 without issues. You just need to adjust video settings to match what your card can handle.

muchas gracias

[Myztkl©-Kev]

game is pretty well optimized if you're not using RT and since you can't with that card, it should be fine on low-med settings. If not you have 2 hours to refund.

[abel.graficos]

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

game is pretty well optimized if you're not using RT and since you can't with that card, it should be fine on low-med settings. If not you have 2 hours to refund.

everything to a minimum ?

[abel.graficos]

Originally posted by Deadmeat:

Yes you can. I did multiple play throughs on a 1060 without issues. You just need to adjust video settings to match what your card can handle.

If it doesn't taste bad
What adjustments did you make?
Thanks in advance

[CptnSpandex]

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

game is pretty well optimized if you're not using RT and since you can't with that card, it should be fine on low-med settings. If not you have 2 hours to refund.

And the reason they did the 2.0 update with the graphics jump was to cover up how poorly optimized dogtown is, without 2.0 people would of been looking at 10fps down there, no joke.

[Myztkl©-Kev]

Originally posted by CptnSpandex:

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

game is pretty well optimized if you're not using RT and since you can't with that card, it should be fine on low-med settings. If not you have 2 hours to refund.

And the reason they did the 2.0 update with the graphics jump was to cover up how poorly optimized dogtown is, without 2.0 people would of been looking at 10fps down there, no joke.

I haven't been there yet but the game is still running basically the same as it did pre-2.0 for me, if not better. I get over 200 fps with RT off, 60-70fps with RT on "ultra" no DLSS and 60-70fps with path tracing DLSS on quality.

[abel.graficos]

works great for me

[Pandora's Actor]

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

Originally posted by CptnSpandex:

And the reason they did the 2.0 update with the graphics jump was to cover up how poorly optimized dogtown is, without 2.0 people would of been looking at 10fps down there, no joke.

I haven't been there yet but the game is still running basically the same as it did pre-2.0 for me, if not better. I get over 200 fps with RT off, 60-70fps with RT on "ultra" no DLSS and 60-70fps with path tracing DLSS on quality.

even a 4090 doesnt do 1080p 200 fps so i dont know where you are getting this from. unless you set it to medium settings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBspiPJi_XI&t=487s

Originally posted by abel.graficos:

works great for me

i would use low to medium. to maybe get 30+ fps else use fsr set on quality mode to try and get a bit more fps. and dependent on your cpu set crowd density to low for sure

[Zer0]

Originally posted by CptnSpandex:

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

game is pretty well optimized if you're not using RT and since you can't with that card, it should be fine on low-med settings. If not you have 2 hours to refund.

And the reason they did the 2.0 update with the graphics jump was to cover up how poorly optimized dogtown is, without 2.0 people would of been looking at 10fps down there, no joke.

What? Do you think the game switches engines when you get into dogtown? It's the same performance, just significantly higher visual fidelity and more dense (much more demanding to render). That's not poor optimization, unless you have issues with FPS elsewhere on 2.0 and think your FPS is lower than your specs should get.

I personally have no complaints with performance whatsoever. And it largely appears those with good GPUs and a weak CPU are getting hit the hardest, despite them upping minimum requirements.

I really don't see current gen owners complaining. Unlike some games where even the 4090 owners were like what is this crap? That Jedi game launch comes to mind.

Starfield, by comparison, launched with the 4090 actually being outperformed by the 7900 XTX which is abysmal (https://youtu.be/7JDbrWmlqMw). Now that's poor optimization, regardless if it's caused by drivers or the engine.

[Zer0]

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

even a 4090 doesnt do 1080p 200 fps so i dont know where you are getting this from. unless you set it to medium settings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBspiPJi_XI&t=487s

Your timestamp is 1440p, and 1080p shows over 180 fps. That's pretty damn close. Considering it actually is beaten by the 7900 XTX in that chart it's quite obviously CPU bound my friend. I didn't even need to watch the video to figure that out.

On no planet is someone with a 4090 running @ 1080p medium. And that would make no difference. I don't think anyone with a 4090 is running 1080 period.

[CptnSpandex]

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

I haven't been there yet but the game is still running basically the same as it did pre-2.0 for me, if not better. I get over 200 fps with RT off, 60-70fps with RT on "ultra" no DLSS and 60-70fps with path tracing DLSS on quality.

even a 4090 doesnt do 1080p 200 fps so i dont know where you are getting this from. unless you set it to medium settings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBspiPJi_XI&t=487s

Originally posted by abel.graficos:

works great for me

i would use low to medium. to maybe get 30+ fps else use fsr set on quality mode to try and get a bit more fps. and dependent on your cpu set crowd density to low for sure

He is talking crap mate, you do get them, they make up false statements on the imaginary system they have so they can feel good about themselves but just make themselves look silly.

[Myztkl©-Kev]

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

Originally posted by Myztkl©-Kev:

I haven't been there yet but the game is still running basically the same as it did pre-2.0 for me, if not better. I get over 200 fps with RT off, 60-70fps with RT on "ultra" no DLSS and 60-70fps with path tracing DLSS on quality.

even a 4090 doesnt do 1080p 200 fps so i dont know where you are getting this from. unless you set it to medium settings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBspiPJi_XI&t=487s

Originally posted by abel.graficos:

works great for me

i would use low to medium. to maybe get 30+ fps else use fsr set on quality mode to try and get a bit more fps. and dependent on your cpu set crowd density to low for sure

yeah... definitely don't get 200fps... https://imgur.com/D6PsvWQ I have a 13700kf and a 3080ti. This is without RT or DLSS like I said in my original post, basically maxed everything else. Admittedly It's more like 150 in dense crazy areas, but I see over 200 in a lot of instances. https://imgur.com/a/MKouGnw

[abel.graficos]

I have simply optimized it from Nvidia and only changed 1920 x 1080 since the optimization of the NDVIDIA program
and it works very well for me (plus the graphics look great)
Thank you all for your help comments