Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Where it shines is its writing.
That is extremely debatable lol.
I really like it for many things, but it is far from perfect let's be honest.
BG3 is it if you like rpgs.. tho if scifi is your thing then this is right up there.
Good, may be. But best? There are much better contesters.
It's good, I play it, I like it, but saying it's the best RPG ever pretty much just says it's the only RPG you've ever played.
Baldur’s Gate 3 is better.
But to really blow my socks off it really DOES need to not only do something new, but do it exceptionally well.
20 years from now you won't have games emulating mechanics introduced in Cyberpunk, because it's just emulating mechanics found in older games like Morrowind and BG2...two games which set the standards still being followed today and which were absolutely mindblowing when they came out.
That doesn't mean Cyberpunk is a bad game. It just means you can't call it best ever,.
Making a leveling system that existed for 3 years in a RPG shooter mean nothing now and lazy level-scaling have made the game worse. Unfortunate.
Meh. I'm having a hard time getting into Act 3. Just not grabbing me the way Acts 1 and 2 did.
Cyberpunk on the other hand I found compelling start to finish.
I kind of disagree with you here. BG2 didn't do anything really knew when you compare it to BG1 and some of the later editions of the Gold Box games... it just did it better. Morrowind's story was out of this world, but it's mechanics were clunky to be honest.
You don't need to be innovative or do something new... you just have to do it better... and have a really, really good story. Morrowind wouldn't be Morrowind if it's story wasn't stellar. Something that Bethesda has been trying to capture again for years.
Fallout 1 wasn't great because it was original or innovative, in fact it was nothing more than a spiritual successor to Wasteland. Still Fallout has spawned generations of games, and Wasteland has become a footnote in the Fallout series (which is a shame I loved Wasteland).
How many people remember Bard's Tale, WIzardry, Planescape, and to this day talk fondly of them, and it was those games that spawned BG2.
You don't need new... but you do need exceptionally well.
Without exceptionally well you're destined to be forgotten.