This game is surprisingly good

[Zim]

Just bought it a couple of days ago for 27€ and I'm surprised on how well designed Cyberpunk is. The gameplay is very enjoyable (I do the blunt weapon melee build), the world looks amazing. The character design, the dialogues and even the story itself seem to be actually good for a change.

Imagine this was the game they had released a couple of years ago

[M8M]

Originally posted by Zim:

Just bought it a couple of days ago for 27€ and I'm surprised on how well designed Cyberpunk is. The gameplay is very enjoyable (I do the blunt weapon melee build), the world looks amazing. The character design, the dialogues and even the story itself seem to be actually good for a change.

Imagine this was the game they had released a couple of years ago

I started playing when it came out and never really understood why so many people felt the need to bash the game (PS4 and Xbox versions aside). It's easily one of my all-time favorite games.

Anyways, glad you're enjoying it : )

[Neblunoa]

The game is pretty good but they sold it as something different than what it really is and many people got angry when they didn't find what they expected.

[Chaosolous]

This is basically the game they sold 3 years ago.

It's a more polished version of the game I bought 2 years ago.

The narrative and missions haven't changed, just some mechanics.

It's been good. Nice of you to notice though.

[spice_]

now with 2.0 this game is like Skyrim, can play it endlessly really

[xaero]

Originally posted by M8M:

Originally posted by Zim:

Just bought it a couple of days ago for 27€ and I'm surprised on how well designed Cyberpunk is. The gameplay is very enjoyable (I do the blunt weapon melee build), the world looks amazing. The character design, the dialogues and even the story itself seem to be actually good for a change.

Imagine this was the game they had released a couple of years ago

I started playing when it came out and never really understood why so many people felt the need to bash the game (PS4 and Xbox versions aside). It's easily one of my all-time favorite games.

Anyways, glad you're enjoying it : )

It is the Kids that have low quality hardware, and then they write bad reviews....

I never had a problem from Day one when it first came out.... sure, there were a few odd bugs here and there... but not game breaking... and did not stop me from playing...

[Neblunoa]

Originally posted by xaero:

Originally posted by M8M:

I started playing when it came out and never really understood why so many people felt the need to bash the game (PS4 and Xbox versions aside). It's easily one of my all-time favorite games.

Anyways, glad you're enjoying it : )

It is the Kids that have low quality hardware, and then they write bad reviews....

I never had a problem from Day one when it first came out.... sure, there were a few odd bugs here and there... but not game breaking... and did not stop me from playing...

This game has many more problems beyond optimization (which also seems pretty decent to me). Starting because it was sold as an RPG in which all decisions mattered and it ends up being a simple action shooter. Most of the side quests, which are the company's hallmark, are filler typical of an Assassin's Creed, I can only save 3 or 4 chains. Not to mention that the main story is very short and completely rushed both in the beginning and the end. Do you want me to continue? Cuz i have many more complains

[Troy Muni]

Wow, I can't believe someone actually finds the dialogue interesting. I literally had to force myself to play it to give it a chance. I just can't though. It feels like such a slog to me. The story, the characters and most of all - the dialogue...completely uninterested. I had more fun modding it to see how good I could make it look than I did doing anything in the game itself.

[Jack Sparrow]

I bought the game on release and refunded it after an hour because of all the bugs and horrible performance.

Came back for 2.0 and played through it and MAN.. the contrast between Cyberpunk and Starfield is almost comical.

CDPR have some absolutely outrageous talent in their studio, I mean we all knew it after the Witcher 3 and its expansions, the writing, animation, voice acting, direction, world, lore, everything in this game makes Starfield look like it was designed and built by amateurs in comparison.

Now, yes, i know they arent exactly the same type of game but they are very similar in the way you play through them, It's jarring being able to seamlessly walk in and out of buildings anywhere in cyberpunk when youve just played starfield, a game where you cant even enter a tiny shop without a loading screen.

[TripSin]

It's good. It was also good when it was released.

[Viper]

Originally posted by Longdick Johnson:

I bought the game on release and refunded it after an hour because of all the bugs and horrible performance.

Came back for 2.0 and played through it and MAN.. the contrast between Cyberpunk and Starfield is almost comical.

CDPR have some absolutely outrageous talent in their studio, I mean we all knew it after the Witcher 3 and its expansions, the writing, animation, voice acting, direction, world, lore, everything in this game makes Starfield look like it was designed and built by amateurs in comparison.

Now, yes, i know they arent exactly the same type of game but they are very similar in the way you play through them, It's jarring being able to seamlessly walk in and out of buildings anywhere in cyberpunk when youve just played starfield, a game where you cant even enter a tiny shop without a loading screen.

I find the Starfield hate comical. This is a Cyberpunk forum. People feel the need to hate on every game that there not playing at the moment.