DLSS 3.5 works for 30 cards too right?

[Kasper Kroenen]

Because I don't see the ability to turn anything on besides the new things (like path tracing etc and reconstructions and more) but only the option for DLSS 2.0 is available and DLSS 3 is greyed out that only 40 cards can use said feature. So where is the DLSS 3.5 option? Nvidia said that DLSS 3.5 should work for all RTX cards and yes, I did the whole "delete Usersettings.json" bug as some other people mentioned and yes, I of course updated drivers...

[fux]

frame generation only for 40 cards still, the 3.5 naming scheme is kinda misleading

[Kasper Kroenen]

Originally posted by ᶠᵘˣ:

frame generation only for 40 cards still, the 3.5 naming scheme is kinda misleading

wait, I don't understand... NVIDIA says that DLSS 3.5 is released with their newest updates and will be available to ALL RTX cards to enjoy its benefits with the first few games to be enable said features games like Cyberpunk 2077 because if its upcoming expansion.

[shamalamadingdong]

DLSS 3.5 is just DLSS. Stop letting Nvidia confuse you. You don't get anything new if you have a 3000 series or less. It's all nonsense.

[Deep Space K9]

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

Originally posted by ᶠᵘˣ:

frame generation only for 40 cards still, the 3.5 naming scheme is kinda misleading

wait, I don't understand... NVIDIA says that DLSS 3.5 is released with their newest updates and will be available to ALL RTX cards to enjoy its benefits with the first few games to be enable said features games like Cyberpunk 2077 because if its upcoming expansion.

The naming scheme is dumb. Basically we don't get Frame Generation but we get Ray Reconstruction.

[Kasper Kroenen]

Originally posted by Deep Space K9:

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

wait, I don't understand... NVIDIA says that DLSS 3.5 is released with their newest updates and will be available to ALL RTX cards to enjoy its benefits with the first few games to be enable said features games like Cyberpunk 2077 because if its upcoming expansion.

The naming scheme is dumb. Basically we don't get Frame Generation but we get Ray Reconstruction.

does ray reconstruction give the boost in framerate as they advertised it then?

[ToMiBriX]

Dlss 3.5 is not Framegeneration, only Ray Reconstruction for better reflections and more performance. sry bro.

[Marmalade]

Yeah they did say that Ray Reconstruction was meant for all RTX cards, but it seems it can only work when you are in RTX Overdrive or have Path Tracing enabled. Not sure if that was a bug/glitch or it's how it was meant to be.

[Deep Space K9]

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

Originally posted by Deep Space K9:

The naming scheme is dumb. Basically we don't get Frame Generation but we get Ray Reconstruction.

does ray reconstruction give the boost in framerate as they advertised it then?

I haven't tested settings independently but turning on RT Overdrive definitely nukes my FPS on a 3080 Ti. Switching DLSS to Balanced mostly fixes that. Frame Gen would definitely be a huge help on this preset if I had a 40 series. All other presets work great though.

[Skjoldur]

Yes, DLSS 3.5 is for all RTX cards.
However, CDPR decided to lock the only new DLSS 3.5 feature, Ray Reconstruction, behind Path Tracing.
That makes it pretty much impossible to use it on anything other than a 40 series card with Frame Generation.

[Marmalade]

Originally posted by Skjoldur:

Yes, DLSS 3.5 is for all RTX cards.
However, CDPR decided to lock the only new DLSS 3.5 feature, Ray Reconstruction, behind Path Tracing.
That makes it pretty much impossible to use it on anything than a 40 series card with Frame Generation.

Oh that's absolutely messed up. >:(

[Kasper Kroenen]

Originally posted by Skjoldur:

Yes, DLSS 3.5 is for all RTX cards.
However, CDPR decided to lock the only new DLSS 3.5 feature, Ray Reconstruction, behind Path Tracing.
That makes it pretty much impossible to use it on anything other than a 40 series card with Frame Generation.

I have an RTX 3080 and...

ye just tried... I barely get 20 FPS even with all graphics settings turned down to "medium" the moment I turn on Ray Reconstruction, it force enables Path tracing, which makes the game unplayable....

What's... what's even the point then? According to Steam only a very small % of its userbase has such powerful hardware. NVIDIA advertises its magical RR and DLSS 3.5 and that it works for ALL RTX cards and Cyberpunk does too.

This game just wants to be stable and playable for only its smallest demographic then?

[Deep Space K9]

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

Originally posted by Skjoldur:

Yes, DLSS 3.5 is for all RTX cards.
However, CDPR decided to lock the only new DLSS 3.5 feature, Ray Reconstruction, behind Path Tracing.
That makes it pretty much impossible to use it on anything other than a 40 series card with Frame Generation.

I have an RTX 3080 and...

ye just tried... I barely get 20 FPS even with all graphics settings turned down to "medium" the moment I turn on Ray Reconstruction, it force enables Path tracing, which makes the game unplayable....

What's... what's even the point then? According to Steam only a very small % of its userbase has such powerful hardware. NVIDIA advertises its magical RR and DLSS 3.5 and that it works for ALL RTX cards and Cyberpunk does too.

This game just wants to be stable and playable for only its smallest demographic then?

You're looking at 2023's Crysis. Yes, only the top 1% is going to be able to play the most extreme settings. That's kind've the point. It'll be used to show off the next RTX series of cards in 2025. That being sad, I was able to achieve 40-50 FPS by switching DLSS to Balanced. I could probably get more in Performance but ew.

[Marmalade]

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

Originally posted by Skjoldur:

Yes, DLSS 3.5 is for all RTX cards.
However, CDPR decided to lock the only new DLSS 3.5 feature, Ray Reconstruction, behind Path Tracing.
That makes it pretty much impossible to use it on anything other than a 40 series card with Frame Generation.

I have an RTX 3080 and...

ye just tried... I barely get 20 FPS even with all graphics settings turned down to "medium" the moment I turn on Ray Reconstruction, it force enables Path tracing, which makes the game unplayable....

What's... what's even the point then? According to Steam only a very small % of its userbase has such powerful hardware. NVIDIA advertises its magical RR and DLSS 3.5 and that it works for ALL RTX cards and Cyberpunk does too.

This game just wants to be stable and playable for only its smallest demographic then?

Best bet is to base your settings on RTX Medium with DLSS Perfomance, and set any Ultra settings to High. Depending on your systems specs, you should get maybe a max of 80 fps in the benchmark tool provided by the game. Although I limit it to 60.

And if you want a comparison on sys specs, here ya go:

RTX 3060ti (latest driver 537.42)
32gb RAM
i7-10700k 3.8 GHz
Ran on an SSD

[Kasper Kroenen]

Originally posted by Marmalade:

Originally posted by Kasper °,_,°:

I have an RTX 3080 and...

ye just tried... I barely get 20 FPS even with all graphics settings turned down to "medium" the moment I turn on Ray Reconstruction, it force enables Path tracing, which makes the game unplayable....

What's... what's even the point then? According to Steam only a very small % of its userbase has such powerful hardware. NVIDIA advertises its magical RR and DLSS 3.5 and that it works for ALL RTX cards and Cyberpunk does too.

This game just wants to be stable and playable for only its smallest demographic then?

Best bet is to base your settings on RTX Medium with DLSS Perfomance, and set any Ultra settings to High. Depending on your systems specs, you should get maybe a max of 80 fps in the benchmark tool provided by the game.

tbh, I'll be fair. I'm playing in 4K. But I could get "stable" enough framerate above 60 normally when I played it back in the day. So I thought that with RR now to be enabled with latest update of NVIDIA I'd see improvement in that department. But it FORCES overdrive + Path-tracing on, which nukes my framerate to barely 20... so I just... don't understand?

[Kasper Kroenen]

RTX 3080 and an I9-10900K