Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This make me confused better upgrade to 4080 or 4070 Ti because the price far from 4070 Ti, yeah 4080 too expensive but winter 2024 4080 Ti will release.
I saw on Youtube, 4080 can run 70-80fps RT overdrive + dlss quality, if use FG can run over 80fps on 4K.
What you feel when use FG? the image movement stutter or delay like over 10ms monitor? or feel same like use dlss 2?
As for frame generation, I don't quite feel the input lag. It's probably there, but the enemy AI moves in similar patterns all the time, so if you get used to it, it shouldn't be a problem even if it's there.
I'm running a 4080 on 1440p, max settings with the exception of the path tracing option I mentioned + DLSS FG. Never really noticed it dip below 120 FPS. Path tracing drops it another 20-30 FPS or so.
DLSS FG input lag is noticeable at first, but I quickly got used to it, as this is not really a game that requires pin-point accuracy.
I play PS5 with performance mode 60fps on 4K TV, I think input lag in console not better than 4070 Ti with FG.
Yeah after I watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFpx7uuAS40&lc=Ugz2ZzVd8TZ2IyVdO494AaABAg.9qTs4VAF3pf9qUzCJunnvQ FG much better if 60fps use reflex low latency on.
My planning just buy 4070 Ti and PS5 Pro. I'm done play with PC, the price going expensive and not worth it.
In the future I just play online games on PC. And play on console for single players games.
AMD will show the power gpu on PS5 PRO in 2024 with RDNA 4. I think ray tracing will be stable and FSR going better than DLSS 3.
I know after I watch from Digital Foundry, many artifact graphics with FG on but just little. I think not affect in gameplay, because human eye hard to seem with fast movement
But yeah I don't want change my mind to buy 4080, I fix buy 4070 Ti. But in my country just have PNY, Palit and Colorful. what third brand are good?
And do you try The Witcher 3 with RT ultra+ what happen in big city with many NPC? this make me confused about 4070 Ti performance, but I think this card can run 60-70fps with RT Ultra+
I skip buy 4080 because too expensive and my target just 60fps is enough for me in 1440p.
And make me worry about second hand price.
But yeah 4070 Ti is the first time 70 series have super power GPU, not like 870, 1070 Ti, 2070 Ti or 3070 Ti.
4070 Ti is the new class for 70 series in 4000 series.
If you're planning an upgrade, don't forget about the importance of the CPU as well. Realistically, you'll get the best idea if you just look up benchmark videos for your specific CPU + the GPU you're considering. The 4070Ti, in theory, should be able to run pretty much anything close to maxed or maxed on 1440p, if paired with a capable CPU. Especially if frame generation is involved.
Yeah my list MSI 4070 Ti 3x Ventus. Next week I buy this card
I saw this video, he compared with 4080 and 4090 on 4K and 1440p. He compared performance with the price. 4080 not much different for 1440p with 4070 Ti, because 4070 Ti is same like 3090 Ti, but if FG on much faster 4070 Ti then 3090 Ti.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgVVrmoumcw
If you want to play ultra with path tracing at 1440p youll get like 40 fps native.
Dlss quatity makes it 60+ all the time.
With dlss3 + frame gen stable 120
At 1080p you can plau ultra + raytracing on native with 60 all the time.