Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm on an I7-6700K (4ghz), which is just one step up from the I7-6700 (3.4ghz) that is the new minimum, sooo yeah... i'm a bit worried.
I have a i7-8700k, a very solid processor when it was new, and really don’t want to go through the massive hassle of replacing it just to play at 1440p with high settings.
any clue what fps and settings they're using for this "recommend" build?
According to CDPR the new "recommended" is for 1080p 60fps on high settings, no RT:
https://assets-prd.ignimgs.com/2023/06/12/cyber-1686581561632.jpg
That made me smile seeing more than 16GB for a game. Finally!
I have a Popular LG 1080p @ 240 monitor, looking at a 4k monitor. Right now isn't it stated that Overdrive is stupid to use, that it's just pointless and won't give you better visuals for the sacrafice in performance?
The pic is really telling. It even lists settings to use :) We need to get that pic for current day cp2077 to answer the question.
Where did it come from? Where did you get it?
That pic creates so many questions and answers.
Right now I have a 2080 and can tell you it's borderline RT capable and shelved the game until I could turn it on. Thus the GFN mention earlier. People might've done the same. This DLC will probably cause most who shelved the game since release, it just seems proper to include that image in the store page as you want CDPR to be trusted by everyone again. They have some awesome other projects coming up too (w1,w4).
They call it "Expected FPS", whatever that means, and Min as 30fps and Rec'd as 60fps.
They don't call it "Minimum FPS", "Average FPS", "Median FPS", or any other scientific measurement. I believe that distinction is part of the issues I come across in forums for other games where people are slightly above or at the recommended specs and are having tons of issues. Heck it took me this long after release to comfortably play it cause I couldn't for the life of me hit 60fps w/ RT with a system well above the recommended.
(They need to include that pic in the store!!)
Phantom Liberty released: Sep 2023
Cyberpunk 2077 released: Dec 2020
I want to point out the biggest game last year. Elden Ring. Here's it's specs:
At release we questioned why. Then concluded since it's a Playstation 5 to PC port as are all From games, the Rec'd specs are almost identical to a PC that would perform closest to the PS5. What people were stuck on was how close the two cpu's were between the min & rec'd. Also, that was a 4-year old Intel and 2-year old AMD cpu at release and AMD fans felt it was unfair. If your Rec'd is a 2-year old cpu, you're going to exclude many people from hitting 60fps, I imagine most people understand that.
EDIT: wanted to clarify one question:
"So if I uncheck install DLC, does that mean I go back to the requirements of the base game?"
I can't imagine the answer is yes.
If the answer is no, on Steam at least, you can't prevent Steam from updating or pick the version of the game to use. That means that those that originally bought a game could get a mandatory update that prevents them from playing? There's no way that the cpu is going to be more demanding.. like I said there's just so many questions and this don't make sense as it was asked in the op and as this pic presents.
My bet would be on them using the beta branch functionality to allow people to play a 'classic' version of the game without the update. But they've not said yet so far as I know.
Phantom Liberty https://www.cyberpunk.net/en/news/48271/update-to-pc-system-requirements
So there is a website with official statement included with the specs expected for you to have.
It explains everything.
IT should be pinned to any serious discussion about the topic.
Now I am going to offer some of my thoughts about this.
HDD, a type of storage device that uses stacked records imagine a stack of disks and a long needle on the end of a pencil reads those disks. If you have seen a record player you know exactly what this looks like. Well that technology stopped being a real thing back in 1985.
So guys, SSD drives use electrons to transmit data but still use SATA ports.
However we can use NVME drives!
NVME drives are not using SATA ports, they use PCLE ports....DATA transmission is now about 30 times faster than what SATA allows.
On 5th generation of NVME current year.
But for some reason people seriously play modern games on HDD drives....
Man I get that there are pre-builds that build this sort of trash in but HDD was not meant to be a gaming drive after around like the 90's dude.
Also the idea that all graphics settings should work flawlessly on a machine that meets min spec is just dumbfounding to me, enough to laugh and cry. Just no, that has never ever worked.
This idea that the dev's should own every possible computer combination to test the game is crazy. How many PC's going back 10+ years should they own? When people can seriously show up using an HDD as primary game drive what else in their machine is super old and crusty?
_________________________________________________
So, am I concerned about the system requirements?
Nope, my PC build exceeds all suggested specs.
Only concern is can I find enough interest in actually playing the game through with the new additional content.