Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Here's a PC build benchmarking 1.6 with the same specs as you give for your laptop (adjust expectations as suits):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LR3XNo2RL1o
the game will eventually get fsr 2.0 so that should improve quality and performance although you may be cpu bound.
1650 mobile outclasses the 1050 ti moblie by quite a bit and is not equivalent to compare.
I used to play this game starting from patch 1.5 (when I switched over from Xbox) with only 8gb RAM and on an HDD. It would stutter and be very slow to load in assets and particles even when there isn't anything crazy going on, much like how it would be on a last-gen console. I have since upgraded to an NVMe SSD and 16gb RAM which fixed all of the stuttering and loading issues. At this point, its my GPU bottlenecking performance but its playable and honestly, doing much better than I was anticipating.
EDIT: I also play this at 1280x720 resolution so that might contribute to the consistent performance especially after upgrading my laptop a bit.
a 1050 could run it but I wouldn't use more then medium settings on it
I would imagine 1.6 is a bit more polished and optimised now so you should be fine. I wouldn't expect to run it on the best settings though.
its actually not, the best performance version so far was 1.5
1.6 I actually lost about 10 - 15fps with same settings
FSR, yes. DLSS, no.