does the game still run like shi t or is it better now?

[Zelda]

title. + explain

[Luc.]

Performance wise it's running great on my rig. I can do 1440p and average 60fps with raytracing and DLSS balanced. Happy new year

[Искорка]

The recommended requirements are still not fixed and are working at 30-50 fps. Maybe patch 1.5 will change something. I believe.

[Zyna Morixia]

just tested the game in the engineers partition of my works laptop (lenovo legion Y520 with GTX1060 and SSD boot with 16GB RAM and i7 7700 processor) game runs at 40FPS on 720p without any audio issues but does crash after about 2 hours of play (this is the worst computer i have access to with regards to specs it was previously our IT heads gaming PC)

[J]

If you can't run this game, you need an upgrade. Games will keep releasing based on the standards set by other games.

[Affronter]

Originally posted by Zelda:

title. + explain

Even after reading your rather vague title you need to explain your system that you plan on playing CPMMLXXVII on.

Or is this just another "Swoop-in-with-the-Troll-Post-and-Never-Return-Thread"?

[Zelda]

Originally posted by Affronter:

Originally posted by Zelda:

title. + explain

Even after reading your rather vague title you need to explain your system that you plan on playing CPMMLXXVII on.

i did.

[Affronter]

Originally posted by Zelda:

Originally posted by Affronter:

Even after reading your rather vague title you need to explain your system that you plan on playing CPMMLXXVII on.

i did.

Not really. Laptop/desktop? Overclocks or not? Windows version? Expected resolution?

[Zebedee]

Originally posted by nullifiedcat:

The recommended requirements are still not fixed and are working at 30-50 fps. Maybe patch 1.5 will change something. I believe.

Recommended seemed targeted at 30fps on release, several tech sites commented on it at the time. It's certainly not for 60fps. Hopefully further work will lift performance across the board but I'd not be expecting miracles for older systems, and certainly not for anyone unwilling to match settings to system.

[Zelda]

Originally posted by Affronter:

Originally posted by Zelda:

i did.

Not really. Laptop/desktop? Overclocks or not? Windows version? Expected resolution?

in my previous comments. also, obviously desktop and obviously windows.... and most common resulution there is ...1920x1080

[Jim Zero]

Ryzen 9 3900X
2070 Super
64g RAM

Seems to work ok for me.

[Mortus Eclipse]

In all honesty I find it runs fine on a Gen 5 i5 5500k with 16GB RAM and an AMD RX5700 through Proton on Linux Mint. My rig is seriously a Frankenstein of multiple generations of hardware.

[󠀡󠀡]

Yes, it runs terribly on non RTX computers, This game was built for RTX 30 series graphics cards. It's basically a demo for RTX 30 series graphics cards to show off the graphics. If you don't have a minimum of a RTX 3070, you're out of luck. It will run awfully. And before you comment on the fact that I don't have the little mouse icon, I do own it on GOG and I completed the story on Corpo and Street kid.

The game is fun, you just have to own a 30 series graphics card to actually get over 1 fps on low. It's a shame how badly optimised it is because the game is actually fun.

[Mithrandir]

Never ran like shi t on my PC.

And I run it at high/ultra with around 50 fps on a GTX 1660 super.

[Guyver]

Honestly, what is with you people running PS4-like specs?

[N7 Andy]

Full dynamic lighting is butchering lower end systems (especially consoles) + massive seamless world (no loading screens) .. You have no idea how ridiculous that is to implement and hope the game will run fine. It's not that it's un-optimised (it can be better though, I'm sure) , it's just super demanding.