Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Make no mistake, Cyberpunk is highly political.
It's the same with Deus Ex games, if you have political knowledge you can really dig quite deeply into what the games are bringing up, even though not everything in those games happen yet.
Cyberpunk is not wrong that the power is more into the hand of corpos, we've seen for decades how many wilfully give up on their own bargaining power of unions just to help the top guy in hopes that it helps us in the end. It's a bit like helping the healthiest patient in the hospital.
Well, a recent study said what most everyone already knows. 50 years of trickle down has not worked.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tax-cuts-rich-50-years-no-trickle-down/
Who runs the show? Should it be like this?
"The analysts found that when controlling for the power of economic elites and organized interest groups, the influence of ordinary Americans registers at a "non-significant, near-zero level." The analysts further discovered that rich individuals and business-dominated interest groups dominate the policymaking process. The mass-based interest groups had minimal influence compared to the business-based interest groups"
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/most-non-rich-us-voters-have-near-zero-level-impact-on-national-policy-new-study-concludes
Why are for instance millennials quite a lot poorer than some other more recent generations? It's not by mistake, but by design.
I think that that's a half truth: it's by mistake and its by design.
The mistake (or, one mistake) was this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient-market_hypothesis
The design was incorporating that hypothesis into laws and policies.
It's not all bad, but it's definitely not all good.
And, rather than the cyberpunk future, I would anticipate that an EMH future would be a future where we can buy the right to search for the ads we like. And, deluxe ad systems would support the ability to view other ads while viewing ads -- sort of along the lines of "picture in picture".
Anyways... we do need to come up with something better. But the way things are right now is maybe not awful enough to really motivate that. And it probably doesn't help that people tend to be really annoying about things.
But, still: "not by mistake, but by design" suggests something different from what actually happened.
No religious nor political talk permitted? Okay gestapo but just about anything could be considered one or the other. It's a childish policy just don't forget the door swings both ways.
The internet and video games have become medium for oppressive dictation, harassment, abuse, censorship and brainwashing.
The very things, books, cinema and video games have been alluding to for about 75 years. WAKE UP! Don't let them control what you know and think.
You are in false dilemma[google.com] territory.
The logic is...
It's like listen to someone short a few of a six pack, explain to you, that when listening to a record in revers the devil is speaking to you in tongues. And they are the expert in this because they spent all their life locked up in a dark room listening. They even give you links to demon knowledge web sights. And then you have others who, unclear who they are, jump in and are like "yeah it dose" and so forth.
As if NO game or movie ever, ever made, has Corp in charge of everything. Resident Evil is a example of such a game. The "Alien" movie is a Example of such a movie. Another movie is Johnny Mnemonic. Another game is Fall Out. Because it has been stated Vault Tech is tied into what happen that lead to WWIII. Now most of my games are Combat genre games. And many of mine are older games because I am not "gotta have a new game because it is new.." I play what I like, if I do not like it, I will not be buying it.
But wait, I am sure someone can list other type games that also are in this as well. So CP2077 Is not some kind of hidden political agenda that needs to be driven out.
What really needs to be driven out is the fiction-dramatics by these people who obviously need to unplug and go discover the world outside their cave.... to add, this guy does not even own the game on steam anyway..
If you think it isn't it's usually because the political thing you think isn't agrees with or doesn't challenge your politics.
And the genre of "cyberpunk" typically comes prepackaged with a lot of messaging on it's own- as others have noted.
Finally, game publishers like to call what they do "apolitical" mostly out of fear of offending some part of their audiences' sensibilities with a product.
It would help if you actually used it in a sensible context. You're like a color-blind man telling someone else they're mistaken because they see blue.
I MUST be crazy for reading between their thin lines.
"OH YEAH!" Said Kool Aid man after pulling both straws from his nose.
By NO political discussions I thought they meant NO heavy real world politics. And I really think that has more to do with so many foreign nations and third parties being involved.
Now they're more focused on damage control and keeping peace than letting people speak their minds.
But remember, let them take one inch and they'll try take another then they'll be taking miles. That's what happens when people don't stand their ground, because tyrants always want more. If you don't keep them busy trying to stop everyone from saying whatever the ♥♥♥♥ they feel like they'll try to take something else away from us. Keep them busy fighting a futile battle. I mean to say, ONLY fight the battles you can win BUT keep them distracted with a battle they believe is real and worth directing all of their attention to. Hopefully they'll never figure it out. More often than not they never do.
Why should it be closed?
There was another topic that was opened that was specifically about real world politics and it quickly devolved into a huge argument and was closed, so that's probably what they are remembering. As for this topic, seeing as its based on in-game and fictional politics, doesn't deserve to be closed (imo).