Full body mirror

[Ya'tari Khay]

Where is it? anyone found one?

[Mansen]

Your inventory. That's it as far as I can tell.

[EASY PETE]

Photomode

[EvilDonut]

Nope. Another lie by CDPR it seems.

[Ya'tari Khay]

yeah, im talking about the one from the Deep dive video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FknHjl7eQ6o&t=488s&ab_channel=Cyberpunk2077
at 2:49

[Blackwolfe]

Just.. wouldn't work very well. This due to the hackjob they did with the moments that are third person (motorbike, mirror etc). The gear, hair etc is only really there those times. Other times those things are simply not there. They'd have to change that to add proper reflections.

It's clear that they took a lot of shortcuts.

[Mansen]

Originally posted by Blackwolfe:

Just.. wouldn't work very well. This due to the hackjob they did with the moments that are third person (motorbike, mirror etc). The gear, hair etc is only really there those times. Other times those things are simply not there. They'd have to change that to add proper reflections.

It's less of a hackjob and more of an entirely intentional decision, since they realised reflections of the character were too much on hardware (with or without raytracing)

So they chose simply not to render anything, outside of the mirrors, toggling your model into "vanity/menu" mode while being stuck in place.

[Blackwolfe]

Originally posted by Mansen:

Originally posted by Blackwolfe:

Just.. wouldn't work very well. This due to the hackjob they did with the moments that are third person (motorbike, mirror etc). The gear, hair etc is only really there those times. Other times those things are simply not there. They'd have to change that to add proper reflections.

It's less of a hackjob and more of an entirely intentional decision, since they realised reflections of the character were too much on hardware (with or without raytracing)

So they chose simply not to render anything, outside of the mirrors, toggling your model into "vanity/menu" mode while being stuck in place.

Well, it's not working very well either way since for a short moment you can see the hair, gear etc pop onto the character when getting on a motorbike etc.

[Mansen]

All depends on your caching speed.

[rumpelstiltskin]

i don't think it's about performance, since it's not that expensive to render one more character. i think more like they didn't want to handle all state changes like weapons, animations, etc. i also find it quite disappointing; it would have been cool to casually walk around the city and see yourself. otoh, selection of clothes leaves much to be desired, there's even no cloth simulation (only kenny's bath robe has it, and it bugs out after scene switch)

[Mansen]

Originally posted by rumpelstiltskin:

i don't think it's about performance, since it's not that expensive to render one more character.

You would be surprised at how much a high quality, perfect LOD character eats up. This isn't a distant pedestrian.

[rumpelstiltskin]

Originally posted by ;2996548763054553656:

Originally posted by rumpelstiltskin:

i don't think it's about performance, since it's not that expensive to render one more character.

You would be surprised at how much a high quality, perfect LOD character eats up. This isn't a distant pedestrian.

it's really not much. there are scenes with what looks like 100+ people with good quality. what is expensive, however, is loading characters into RTX trees, since dynamic meshes are pretty expensive there. but i can think of many features i'd prefer they implemented this one instead of.

[feline]

its have photo mode :0

[ʥ]

No mirror... and no books.