Question about Monitor 4k gaming for 2077. yes i have 3090 rtx

[soul like that be capable of]

So i got new pc coming soon with 10th Gen Intel® Core™ i9 10900KF and 3090 and 32 gb or RAM . i just wonder what monitor should i get becasue mine its only up to 1080p

i wonder what 4k monitor should i get . what refresh rate should ti be . should i just get a good 4k montiro with 60 hz or maybe 120 or 144 hz . i am sure it would able to run 120 fps LUL on 4k . overall i like to hear ideas .

[hyperion]

You're not getting 120 FPS in this game at 4K, no matter what GPU you have.

About 4K TVs, mine has 100hz refresh rate, and they don't cost huge amounts of money. I have a 75" Sony Bravia 4K and it was only $1800. My 34" 3440x1440 120hz monitor was just over $1000.

I don't really know about using a TV for a computer monitor though. I don't think that 100hz is external, so if you hook a computer up to it with a HDMI cable, I don't think you're going to get over 60hz.

[ΜΣ†ΛĿ]

4k monitor or TV with inputs capabe of 120hz+ ,4K, 4:4:4 (display port 1.4, HDMI 2.1), and VRR/Gsync/Freesync. The top end GPUs from AMD and Nvidia can finally handle 4k gaming but just barely. Graphics settings will have to be turned down to achieve high fps in next gen games. they are perfect for 1440p at amxed settings + high fps

[soul like that be capable of]

ΜΣ†ΛĿ の投稿を引用：

4k monitor or TV with inputs capabe of 120hz+ ,4K, 4:4:4 (display port 1.4, HDMI 2.1), and VRR/Gsync/Freesync. The top end GPUs from AMD and Nvidia can finally handle 4k gaming but just barely. Graphics settings will have to be turned down to achieve high fps in next gen games. they are perfect for 1440p at amxed settings + high fps

so should i just get 1440p Gysnc monitor then 144 ? 3080 literally play any game over 130 fps on those settings.

[ΜΣ†ΛĿ]

up to you, 1440p almost gwarantees all games to hit 144+ fps at maxed settings with 3090, (if there is no cpu bottlerneck, and maybe no ray tracing)
but at 4k you're still looking at 60+ fps im majority of games at maxed settings.
if you could settle for some lower settings (high instead of ultra) you would most likely be able to hit 100+ fps, the only time this would matter is if you're playing competitive fps games) either way gameplay would be smooth and if you turn off the FPS counter you probably coudn't tell the difference. If I had a 3090 I would go for the 43" 4K monitor, or the 48" lg oled CX.
another option is an ultrawide 3440X1440 and they go up to 200hz nowdays.
you can expect to pay roughly 2K for the 200hz one, but can get the 160hz one for around 1K.

[soul like that be capable of]

ΜΣ†ΛĿ の投稿を引用：

up to you, 1440p almost gwarantees all games to hit 144+ fps at maxed settings with 3090, (if there is no cpu bottlerneck, and maybe no ray tracing)
but at 4k you're still looking at 60+ fps im majority of games at maxed settings.
if you could settle for some lower settings (high instead of ultra) you would most likely be able to hit 100+ fps, the only time this would matter is if you're playing competitive fps games) either way gameplay would be smooth and if you turn off the FPS counter you probably coudn't tell the difference. If I had a 3090 I would go for the 43" 4K monitor, or the 48" lg oled CX.
another option is an ultrawide 3440X1440 and they go up to 200hz nowdays.
you can expect to pay roughly 2K for the 200hz one, but can get the 160hz one for around 1K.

i downgrade from 3090 to 3080 becasue in 4k gaming it made no huge impact from all reviews . but i am kinda not sure that 3080 or 3090 can hold 144 fps ore even 120 fps on all games without a drop at least in reveiws . even 3090 . so i am not sure if 4k 144 or 120 is viable at this point .

[soul like that be capable of]

from all reviews i read it seems 4k monitors are still worked on . so i am kinda thinking to go with maybe 1440p and maybe next year when price point would drop to 4k monitor to get a good one . becasue most of them seems to not so good unless you buy the 1200-1500$ monitor which i am kinda dont think its worth it . i dont know . everything i search it seems 1440p gysnc 144 or 120 HZ seems always has best reviews . and cost 400-600$ might hold on 4k gaming until more montors come out unless there are good 4k screen under 700$ anyone can tell me

[DeadBeat]

For a game like this, even if I could run it at 4k 120-144 fps, I wouldn't do it. Unless I'm rocking a full water cooled system I ain't doing it. The extra fps isn't worth the higher temps and strain on my system. For older games that I can max out at 4k and keep reasonable temps then I'm doing it otherwise it's a waste of time.

[ΜΣ†ΛĿ]

.... の投稿を引用：

from all reviews i read it seems 4k monitors are still worked on . so i am kinda thinking to go with maybe 1440p and maybe next year when price point would drop to 4k monitor to get a good one . becasue most of them seems to not so good unless you buy the 1200-1500$ monitor which i am kinda dont think its worth it . i dont know . everything i search it seems 1440p gysnc 144 or 120 HZ seems always has best reviews . and cost 400-600$ might hold on 4k gaming until more montors come out unless there are good 4k screen under 700$ anyone can tell me

there are no good 4k screens that are that cheap while still ticking all the boxes one would want from a gaming monitor, expect to pay around $1500. otherwise it's not really worh it just for the resolution, it must have gsync or freesync and be 120hz+ have DP 1.4 and/or hdmi 2.1, hdr 1000. 1440p is not bad. Since you got a beast of a GPU maybe you could try some VR and forget about a montor alltogether. since I got the Valve index I have barely even loked at my monitor, I even play cyberpunk thru vorpX. as a matter of fact I don't play any games in pancake mode at all anymore, almost all non VR games can be played in 3D with a VR headset with mouse and keyboard. needs a monster GPU to handle the latest games with good settings tho since it needs to render 2 eyes seperately while hittin 90 fps minimum. Valve index supports 144 hz.

[soul like that be capable of]

DeadBeat の投稿を引用：

For a game like this, even if I could run it at 4k 120-144 fps, I wouldn't do it. Unless I'm rocking a full water cooled system I ain't doing it. The extra fps isn't worth the higher temps and strain on my system. For older games that I can max out at 4k and keep reasonable temps then I'm doing it otherwise it's a waste of time.

i am really thinknig to get a cheaper 1440p that tick all my boxes like people said. wait until a reasonable 4k montiors come on market hopefully next year or so .

[DeadBeat]

.... の投稿を引用：

i am really thinknig to get a cheaper 1440p that tick all my boxes like people said. wait until a reasonable 4k montiors come on market hopefully next year or so .

It's really not about the monitor per say it's what drives the panel is what really counts. Unless you're going bargain basement in terms of quality with regards to what panel you choose.

[soul like that be capable of]

DeadBeat の投稿を引用：

.... の投稿を引用：

i am really thinknig to get a cheaper 1440p that tick all my boxes like people said. wait until a reasonable 4k montiors come on market hopefully next year or so .

It's really not about the monitor per say it's what drives the panel is what really counts. Unless you're going bargain basement in terms of quality with regards to what panel you choose.

this is my setup atm i am still waiting for to assemble it

i9 10900F
3080 (i didnt went with 3090 not worth the $ for extra 5-15% on 4k when 3080 already pushing everything so well
32 gb of ram

i know 1440p every game in next few years will be max out pro in 100 fps if not more pro more . i know 4k would be in 60's but if i play 4k with 60 fps would it be better to have 60 hz monitor over 120 or 144 . just wonder . that bascially my real question .

[Stumpy]

https://www.scan.co.uk/products/43-acer-predator-cg437kp-uhd-144hz-g-sync-compatible-hdr-1000-gaming-monitor-3840x2160-1ms-dp-hdmi?utm_source=google&utm_medium=surfaces&utm_campaign=feed_clicks&utm_content=surfaces_across_google&gclid=Cj0KCQiAoab_BRCxARIsANMx4S70Z11Gf0zCnGV0BjMObESztdBhg1ejZP2Gf_kknolOsc4DvQLetGUaAsNtEALw_wcB

this is the monitor i brought

[soul like that be capable of]

Stumpy の投稿を引用：

https://www.scan.co.uk/products/43-acer-predator-cg437kp-uhd-144hz-g-sync-compatible-hdr-1000-gaming-monitor-3840x2160-1ms-dp-hdmi?utm_source=google&utm_medium=surfaces&utm_campaign=feed_clicks&utm_content=surfaces_across_google&gclid=Cj0KCQiAoab_BRCxARIsANMx4S70Z11Gf0zCnGV0BjMObESztdBhg1ejZP2Gf_kknolOsc4DvQLetGUaAsNtEALw_wcB

this is the monitor i brought

thx but i cant have 43" on my desk . max i think i can do is 27-32" :( i also i have budget cant spend over 1300$ on a screen after spending so much on PC . it need something in reasonable price more or less LUL i have this feeling in next year 4k would drop in price once more models are out .

[soul like that be capable of]

i am thinking this one

LG 27GN950-B.AUS 27" UHD 144Hz DP HDMI AMD FreeSync Technology, G-Sync Compatible HDR 10 IPS LED Gaming Monitor

its around 800$ but it not Gysnc . wonder if this would do . that perfect price range i am willing to spend on a screen

[DeadBeat]

.... の投稿を引用：

this is my setup atm i am still waiting for to assemble it

i9 10900F
3080 (i didnt went with 3090 not worth the $ for extra 5-15% on 4k when 3080 already pushing everything so well
32 gb of ram

i know 1440p every game in next few years will be max out pro in 100 fps if not more pro more . i know 4k would be in 60's but if i play 4k with 60 fps would it be better to have 60 hz monitor over 120 or 144 . just wonder . that bascially my real question .

I've got a 4k gsync monitor that I can overclock to 144 Hz but as I said if the game I'm playing can handle higher frame rates without stressing the ♥♥♥♥ out of my system then I do it otherwise I scale it back to 60 or even lower although I don't do that unless it's not stuttering all to hell.