Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's not going to increase the number of polygons that were designed at least 20 years ago. Not sure what you were expecting, but the link above shows a very favorable outcome. Drag the vertical slider side to side and see for yourself.
or something like that
I was so happy when they released RTX for Quake 2. I played it a bit, but I recently came back to actually give it a full go. Fun old school game, and with amazing lighting that makes it look almost modern IMHO. It runs great on my 2070 Super @2k.
I wish we could all play Weapons Factory together with this new tech. I doubt the person that made that mod is around anymore though. There were a few fun maps I remember trying to defend the flag.
It's impressive in a 20 year old game because the game is 20 years old. It makes RT look better than it is because you are expecting to see a really old game with poor rasterized lighting.
In a modern game like CyberPunk RT is Meh, I can take it or leave it. It's just not much better than modern Rasterization of lighting shadows and reflections.
I do think it's a bit of a scam. And thats coming from a 3080 owner.
Plus, the actual "excitement" is more about the development pipeline than anything else. Being able to set global illumination and light sources and have the scene just "be lit properly no matter what is happening" (like you would in film) is a MASSIVE change over having to bake lights into the scene by hand.
The problem with getting the average consumer to get excited about technology like this is that, in it's perfect state, you wouldn't notice ray tracing.
Reflections would reflect like the brain expects them to.
Shadows would form like you would see out in the world.
Light would cast appropriate color mixture and tonality just like you see in film.
A perfect implementation of Ray Tracing would appear to be "normal" to our brains. So I understand the "what's the big deal" feeling for someone who isn't already fascinated by the development side of things.
Note, that I had to tune the opengl version in the RTX as well, because it was awful compared to the original Q2, it was completely misconfigured.
Odd I found it looked awesome. Cyberpunk is one of the most impressive games I have seen graphically. I was able to run it maxed out at 2k with my 2070S and medium ray tracing. It was gorgeous.
New Technologies are often hyped to sell them to gullible people.