Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Stabilizing zones will take care of insurgents in your backlines, police and militia will kill them on their own and give you a lot of time if its big insurgent force. Could also use trooper to stay in neutral area to prevent camp spawns.
Yet I read that people beat the game on brutal so maybe it just seems unfair as you are not using optimal strategies. I only play on normal right now, so I don't mean to critique.
''My cousin won the lottery yesterday, so its logical for me to play lottery for the rest of my life as well.''
WOW.
They happen in casual as well, but its more controllable so you dont get irritated as much. This thing is a joke, honestly. I dont understand the people who can enjoy it, and calling it a game? If that aint reaching i dont what is.
At least in plague Inc, there was an explanation for randomized nature of how the game progresses, so you'd know why some things happen and why not. This is a complete downgrade from that. They should fire the lead game designer immediately, if they care about the future of their little indie game developing company, that is.
It really needs to be scaled back.