安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
They really switched their target demographic with 4e and haven't really adjusted it since, only adding more over-the-top options that are mostly ridiculously out of place in the parts of FR the modules/games normally take place.
That said, the githyanki being in BG3 is actually a brilliant addition, given their ties to the plot, and there's effort being put into giving you a lot of options to roleplay one. Still, though, they aren't bird people. Or turtle people. I'd rather have a Genasi, honestly.
Genasi just got buffed in 5e actually. Fantasy races being playable has always been a thing in D&D. Every enemy creature people fight in D&D has been over the years asked for to have a playable version of. If you look at old homebrew the vast majority of it is simply player versions of different races and creatures. 5e has been out for a long time now actually. 5e dropped in 2014, so its been out for 8 years now. They've add tons of player creatures to it over the years. (and the homebrew for player races is crazy high) People do want to just play crazy things. Gamers tend to power game rpg's a lot. Which is why they generally put there player race as just one option on there goal to create there build, while others see race as what they want to play and build around that. While others have a build and just want to pick a specific race to go with it.
http://oganm.com/dndstats/
Human of course is still the most popular race (human variant being probably the most powerful player race in 5e excluding the races like Yaun-Ti pureblood that most dm's refuse to let players run)
Now you understand the toxicity that is fan service. It has the potential to ruin things.
A tabaxi's presence in Baldur's Gate is hardly an unusual coincidence, as official material goes on to elaborate:
This is not to say there are a colossal number of them in any given place, but even if most tabaxi are homebodies, a handful's presence in a major civilian center is not, in fact, so extraordinary as to warrant a complicated personal explanation.
Hopefully the folly of tabaxi exclusion, and inversely, the wisdom of their inclusion, has been laid bare.
In Never winter, your love intrest as a lady was also a tiefling, this one with a tail. While for the guys a reborn human into an asimar paladin, anti paladin, into an avatar.... It was complicated. Exotic to say the least.
Morrowind 1 2 3 :P, you had vampire and were-wolf-bear etc love intrests.
A tabaxxi might be too close to the furry land. Def would be a great sticky finger thief though. Similar to a kender.
Long story, as long as it is well written and not shoe horned.
If it was a half-tabaxi, would Bg3 only half succeed?
And what if Larian added a "Leonin" race instead somehow, would that be considered Tabaxi-worthy?? They aren't labeled as Tabaxi though...but look like lions. 😽🦁
Personally I don't mind any cat-folk race to exist in BG3,, & always felt that Laezel would make a great looking cheetara too. (With the help of modding of course.) https://youtu.be/gZkPsJqDuis