Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yea, and even woman dwarfs can have beards like in LOTR..lol.
https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/ustv/a40695996/lord-of-the-rings-the-rings-of-power-female-dwarves-beards/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-PmAQ9Opu4
"If you’re looking for what’s official in the D&D roleplaying game, it’s what appears in the products for the roleplaying game. Basically, our stance is that if it has not appeared in a book since 2014 (5E), we don’t consider it canonical for the games." - Jeremy Crawford
^ The licensed stuff is to follow the canon, but are not themselves considered canonical.
Just pointing the ridiculousness of the 'canon / non-canon' arguments that keep popping up.
It used to be a customizable game. 5e removed the customization and put in place shallow, cookie-cutter classes which all have the same chance to hit. “‘Bounded accuracy” is terrible in my opinion. I know you have a different opinion, however, it doesn’t make you right.
I must not have that supplement. It must be from a 3rd party.