Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
^^
This
It's even worse when the criticisms contradict one another on a seemingly regular basis.
How are they meant to derive useful feedback from being told that it's not enough like the originals while also being told that they're just regurgitating old ideas?
After a point, it just turns into noise.
Well, you can thank the people who decided to call the game Baldur's Gate 3 to get some extra money out of exactly those "grognards", knowing full well what they were doing.
It might be an idea not to shoulder an exhausting burden for someone else's consciously made business decision.
So, nostalgia
Every other game in the franchise to date has been built on previous, outdated editions of the game. I purchased BG3 specifically because it was the first video game set in 5th edition, and I wanted to see what the current version of D&D plays like.
I'll admit, it has required an adjustment period to get used to all the changes, but I'm still glad to finally see a game that isn't mechanically stuck in the past. Those of us who can't play the table top version finally have a means of getting introduced to the current system.
Not at all, you can still buy BG 1 & 2. That is not what nostalgia means.... a wistful or excessively sentimental yearning for return to or of some past period or irrecoverable condition.
It is not irrecoverable, its a PC game.
Like the person stated it's simply a badging excercise that has nothing to do with the original. If only there was a definition in that world they could use other than a highly established franchise. Maybe call it D&D anything else, because that what it is in essence.
So yeah, it's about as irrecoverable as it can be. And TBH, not using BG3 would be unbelievably stupid. But also, not having BG in the name would probably have been a deal breaker for WotC.
Just stop wallowing in your feels. Larian, WotC and the great majority of the player base do not care.
I feel like you do this on purpose. U spam nostalgia in every comment . But almost no one here has even eluded to nostalgia at all.
Most people have simply said, BG3 isnt really a BG game, its a generic RPG DOS BG inspired by knock off.
The entire premise of the game doesnt even take into account any of the formulas , principles or general premise of what made baldurs gate 1/2 so good.
They clearly didnt look at the source material, nor the fundamental underpinning design features and world building that made them so good.
It has nothing to do with nostalgia or wanting the same thing again. Its about understanding that BG3 is not only not a good BG game, its a mediocre RPG at best because Larian had no respect for the OG games.
Whilst people like you sit here applauding mediocre/low quality game design for what?
Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition.
Baldirs Gate 1 and 2 aren't the Source Material. They are "just" 2 other games made on a much much earlier Edition of Dungeons & Dragons.
You are the one not having any clue about the source material
And they are using the world building that took place after it.
Did anyone think that BG 3 would take place during the Bhaalspawn saga are delusional when D&D descent into avernus happened...