Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But dual wielding do be lit af tho. Two weapons obvs means double twice the power.
So we just gonna have to wait and see if devs did anything to make it better in bg 3.
if it had more utility like giving players extra special off hand attacks... anything really would go along way.
Take the Dual Wielder feat, and you can use full sized weapons, most of which are Strength based. ;-)
Nothing some good ol weapon enchantments can't make up for.
Doesn't matter how hard you hit the enemy, as long as you still manage to get their HP down to 0.
From what I've heard, it sounds like magic items are gonna become much more common in later acts of the game than what we have in EA right now.
Actual factual. Style over substance, bb. Gonna dual wield on my Fighter run 'cause idgaf about playing optimal.
If you're gonna die in battle, you want to make sure you look cool doing it!
Rangers used to get the Two Weapon Fighting for free at level 2, but I presume that's been changed now in 5th edition.