developers reported for bestiality in game.

[Samurai Shampooh]

had to do something, wont allow this to be a trend, and a violation of state and federal laws in the united states.

[ahmannw]

Originally posted by Knight of Heaven:

Originally posted by ahmannw:

I won't either, but it seems more likely Trump would do it than any other in recent memory. Public criminal activity, hostility to pretty much everyone other than Republicans, found to have committed sexual assault, cringey comments about his own daughter, voyeurism at teen USA, "grab 'em by the ♥♥♥♥♥," etc.

I dont know Trump tastes seem to be more mundane a straight foward which i can respect that :P But, wasnt Bill Clinton usual guest at Epstein island? Biden seems to be pretty shady to... not to mention Hollywood

Trump > Clinton > GWB > Biden > Obama at least re more likely to do sex crimes for the last 5 presidents. At least IMHO.

[Munkey Beans]

Transformed Druids can give consent ergo it is not illegal. I feel more sorry for the dude on the receiving end of the bear love.

[Puffin]

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

[Heu, Iterum Id Feci]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

You forgot the reason we have those laws. They are there to protect animals, no because we think it's disgusting.
However there is no animal to protect in this case.
And by all the rules and lore a shapeshifted druid does not count as an animal. He is still a druid. He can not stay in that shape indefinitely, which should give you a clue, that he isn't a real animal. He will turn back sooner or later automagically. If he falls unconcious he will loose the shape etc.

[navigator4223]

Originally posted by Munkey Beans:

Transformed Druids can give consent ergo it is not illegal. I feel more sorry for the dude on the receiving end of the bear love.

From the scene I saw at the PFH there was not only consent but even enthusiastical consent. In fact, Halsin was so hot for Astarion that he couldn't control himself turning into a bear.

This is a prime example for consent.

[Tiviani]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

Still a druid joke about an adult consenting to sex with another adult made of pixels in a dark fantasy, 18+ video game. Nothing is shown but human male genitalia, a smiling bear and a squirrel dropping a nut. Then a fade to black.

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is a joke and no one is promoting bestiality, then I don't know what will.

[ahmannw]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

Lol. You say it requires sexual intercourse between a person and an animal then go on to explain how a game that doesn't include any real people or animals and doesn't depict any sexual intercourse at all includes bestiality. If you want to provide a proof, at least make an assumption that will support your conclusion.

If you said the game includes the suggestion of bestiality without moral judgment, at least you'd be somewhere near the target. And maybe that's bad enough for you, but assuming the morality police mantle doesn't give you any powers of enforcement.

[GrimAtrament]

with the amount of bard x everything jokes in DnD i feel like the OP must not be familiar to much with the series >_> or never played outside adventures league

[Swans]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

This is how a toddler would describe it, if they could write. Because toddlers are unable to comprehend that an object can be something different to what it looks like, or that it's not where they last saw it etc.

Whereas older children can of course understand that just because something looks like something, it is not necessarily that thing. Even cats are quite good at this after a few experiences with it. But seemingly not this poster.

In this case of course, in the game world it's not a non-human animal, we actually see the change, so I think even a toddler would be quite good at comprehending this is not an actual - non-human - animal. And in reality, it's a CGI rendering of a human who has turned into animal form, and therefore is at best equivalent to a painting etc.

[Karl Pilkington]

Originally posted by GrimAtrament:

with the amount of bard x everything jokes in DnD i feel like the OP must not be familiar to much with the series >_> or never played outside adventures league

It's the Satanic Panic all over again

[Actionjackson]

Killing people is not a violation of state and federal laws in the united states? Somehow that seems to check out, so where is the problem with bear love.

[Puffin]

Originally posted by Tiviani:

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

Still a druid joke about an adult consenting to sex with another adult made of pixels in a dark fantasy, 18+ video game. Nothing is shown but human male genitalia, a smiling bear and a squirrel dropping a nut. Then a fade to black.

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is a joke and no one is promoting bestiality, then I don't know what will.

Just because something is digital or fictional story, it is still controlled by the law. You can't write fictional stories which promote racism either...

If I would start to write a racist story here as comment, creating the details story about it, I would be still banned for that, would not??? or writing story about a man who wanna have sex with uder age children? all of these are illegal, and doesn't matter if digital and fictional story with fictional characters.

[Puffin]

Originally posted by Swans:

Originally posted by Lunaria:

First of all so many people seem to not understand what is bestiality:

- sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.

In this case it really fits into the category of bestiality, because the druid transforms into a real phsycal bear form, meaning the human will have sexual act with an animal! Doesn't matter at all if the person/animal constent in this case!

Do you see a bear? Yes. Is the bear animal? Yes.
Doesn't matter what was its past shape, it only matters who has sex with who in that moment.

Also it means, the person (in this case Astarion) loves bestiality!
Should the bestiality be "promoted" or "accepted" in this way and form? if so, why?
I don't think so.

An other example: let's say there is a man, who has rubber dolls at home, but these dolls are male sex dolls. What does it mean? It probably means the man is attracted to other man, meaning he is gay. Right? Just because it is made of rubber, it doesn't mean he has sex with the material of the rubber, but with the actual form what it represents (men).

In this case, doesn't matter what was the druid's previous form, once he turns into a bear form, he counts as an actual animal, also it means again, Astarion loves bestiality as he wished this act to go in this direction. It is so clear, yet people try to defend it for some weird reason, maybe because they also find bestiality normal or they are also interested in it?

If this explanation doesn't prove that it is actual bestiality, then I don't know what will.

This is how a toddler would describe it, if they could write. Because toddlers are unable to comprehend that an object can be something different to what it looks like, or that it's not where they last saw it etc.

Whereas older children can of course understand that just because something looks like something, it is not necessarily that thing. Even cats are quite good at this after a few experiences with it. But seemingly not this poster.

In this case of course, in the game world it's not a non-human animal, we actually see the change, so I think even a toddler would be quite good at comprehending this is not an actual - non-human - animal. And in reality, it's a CGI rendering of a human who has turned into animal form, and therefore is at best equivalent to a painting etc.

Again, just because something is digital or fictional, still controlled by the law, there is no such excuse that you can depict anything in digital format.

Also, even a toddler can comprehend basic logic. Obviously even if we don't see the actual scene, we exactly know what will happen between those. First of all Astarion 3 times said that, he wants it, then the bear is coming to him. Guess what they will do??? Do you think they will play chess or what will happen probably???

[ahmannw]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

Again, just because something is digital or fictional, still controlled by the law, there is no such excuse that you can depict anything in digital format.

Also, even a toddler can comprehend basic logic. Obviously even if we don't see the actual scene, we exactly know what will happen between those. First of all Astarion 3 times said that, he wants it, then the bear is coming to him. Guess what they will do??? Do you think they will play chess or what will happen probably???

True, but sometimes toddlers fail to logically tie an assumption to an outcome. For example, a toddler might think something is not allowed in digital form and come to the conclusion that because it is not allowed in digital form that implying that thing is going to happen might also be prohibited, even though it's not.

[Tiviani]

Originally posted by Lunaria:

Originally posted by Swans:

This is how a toddler would describe it, if they could write. Because toddlers are unable to comprehend that an object can be something different to what it looks like, or that it's not where they last saw it etc.

Whereas older children can of course understand that just because something looks like something, it is not necessarily that thing. Even cats are quite good at this after a few experiences with it. But seemingly not this poster.

In this case of course, in the game world it's not a non-human animal, we actually see the change, so I think even a toddler would be quite good at comprehending this is not an actual - non-human - animal. And in reality, it's a CGI rendering of a human who has turned into animal form, and therefore is at best equivalent to a painting etc.

Again, just because something is digital or fictional, still controlled by the law, there is no such excuse that you can depict anything in digital format.

Also, even a toddler can comprehend basic logic. Obviously even if we don't see the actual scene, we exactly know what will happen between those. First of all Astarion 3 times said that, he wants it, then the bear is coming to him. Guess what they will do??? Do you think they will play chess or what will happen probably???

We will never know what they do because it fades to black.

My guess is a really nice bear hug.