Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some classes start with a subclass, most others get there subclass at level 3.
Ahhhh alright it makes more sense now. I thought for sure that when Druid released, it had sub classes at level 1, maybe I am misremembering.
I am fairly knowledgeable about D&D/Pathfinder in general, however I stopped keeping up with new rule sets at around 3.5 ed of D&D as I felt that it was the pinnacle of the ruleset.
they might as well give all classes subclass at level 1.
most people start players off at 3rd or 4th level in real life table top because subclass is when the fun starts (because thats when you are actually differentiated from other characters)
I think the reason they didn't is because some new players might actually want to take that time to think about their subclass choice, and the events of their csmpaign might impact that choice. Doesn't matter as much for experienced players.
Of course, for some classes, such as Clercs, subclass at level one is necessary because it would hardly make sense otherwise.
Nope, not me and my players, and not any game I've ever been a player in. Start at level 1, live through the dangerous times when a rabbit glaring at you could kill you, and see yourself grow.
Some DMs start off at level 3 certainly--not the vast majority.