Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not sure why such a knee-jerk reaction. No rolling pin will be able to do as much damage unless the DM makes it OP. A scythe can do that much damage at its base form. And it's not unbalanced because speccing into scimitar/rapier in 3e would yield far better results in terms of damage + allow to use shield and get all the AC and item benefits. If you don't know the circumstances - there's no need for a jerk reaction.
Scythe is awesome both in RP and game mech senses. If you don't get it - that's fine. I can live knowing that your opinion differs from mine.
Which is disappointing, because I was hoping to acquire one for my Druids.
You are directly transplanting from 3.5e to 5e, and that just doesn't work.
If you make an op weapon in 5e the type doesn't matter, it's still an op weapon, be it scythe or rolling pin. So the RP potential doesn't come from the weapon type but from the op-ness of the weapon.
So are nunchuku and sais.
The nunchuku were originally used to beat rice grains, while the sai was originally used like a trowel for weeding gardens.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUWoUM4Wttc
Anyway, I see both sides, scythes are completely nonsensical weapons - you get the blade behind someone and then...die as they're stabbing you in your defenseless chest.
But...there are also double axes in d&d which are just absurd.
But cooler.
I don't know if you noticed, but there's no scythe in 5e and the whole topic is about that weapon in the DnD setting. And since 3e/3.5e are the popular editions where scythe is present, it's a valid reference point to display the game mechanics and the related RP elements.
And I am not "transporting" it, I am just refuting unfounded arguments that scythe should go away because it provided for no RP or didn't have a place in the game for some reason. It did. If it is introduced into 5e via some homebrew it will need to follow the balance of 5e but it nevertheless is a valid weapon as I pointed out above.
Edit: and I'm specifically addressing a single point that I quoted with that:
If you want an alternative though, Pathfinder: Wrath of the Rightious does have scythes. Some religious classes in that game such as the Warpriest also start with one if they worship the approperiate god. If I recall correctly, one of the scythes you can find is also borderline broken.
None that I'm aware of; and personally, I've actually never understood how a scythe was supposed to be depicted as an effective weapon in the first place. Just the design of it alone looks like the weapon would be incredibly unwieldy.
It's a huge, curved blade attached to the end of a thin stick, which protrudes out to the side. How are you supposed to hit anybody with this thing, if they move closer than your maximum reach?
A scythe is a symbol of Death after all, and he reaps life the way a farmer does wheat. Moreover it also brings to mind an angry mob of peasants the same way a torch and pitchfork does. So the 'classic' scythe is unwieldy and lame at worst, and a good symbol at best.
Actual warscythes which WERE used by the likes of the Scotts and Danes on the other hand looked very different from the good'ol Reaper/Farmer version.