Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
screen brun happens in most types of OLED and LED/LCD screens too, and it can't be fixed without switching out the screen, the pixel refresh stuff is just a way to prolong the use of the screen, as it actualy readjust the brightness of all the pixels, and actually dims the oled over time.
You could say the same thing for all content viewed on different aspect ratios. It still doesn't get to the actual cause of the issue, it's misleading and thus inaccurate.
The whole point is knowing wtf your panel is capable of and it's behaviour and weakness/strengths are. It all depends entirely on the panel and it's 'light' technology.
In other words, user error. Lack of understanding limitations of product.
I've never had any CRT's with burn in, had 7-8 of them, it was an early problem with plasma screens and today it's on some oleds but not all.
Certain VA and IPS panels are also prone to burn in, but those technologies are much bettter now then even just 1-2 years ago - things are evolving fast and was unfortunately held back still by corona.
If on the market for a new display today, might as well get a display with displayport 2.0/2.1, which will make it much more 4k/8K friendly. Thus going from 32GB/s to 80GB/s dp1.4 to 2.0/2.1 Unfortunately not a lot of products have moved into dp2.1 yet, but it's getting there.
It's also much better in terms of input lag, response times, higher refresh rates, everything just better.
A quick calculation just in terms of bandwidth, it would be equal to going from todays average 240hz on displayport 1.4 without compression, to 691hz, peak and rough estimate, on dp 2.0 at also without compression - and you could enable compression to gain more, and the DSC is even better on 2.0/2.1 then on 1.4.
With compression, 1000hz might be possible if lowering to something like 720p/1080p. Going to need to hardware mod it tho. As in electrical engineering.
So all of that is just insane. But in actual fact for real.
Asus did caugh up one 540hz one, and the problem isn't the bandwidth, it's probably just how to keep the monitor cool enough.
Which is the same problem on all monitors that you want to push for performance. equipping a fan to the back of the monitor is in general a good idea if longevity of the display is a concern. For burn in- most monitors if not all have some kind of power saving feature, if your panel isn't TN, in general you should use it.
This is completely wrong. Screen burn in cannot be fixed without replacing the entire panel itself, on either LCDs or OLEDs. The backlight has nothing to do with burn in.
must be a horrible Temu pc you got there lol