Destiny 2

Destiny 2

Statistiken ansehen:
Kinda being forced to buy seasonal passes?
So...you can't do the mission with saint-14 unless you shove them another 10 bucks? and a numerous of other bounties/weapons are just locked away aswell? wth is that bs?
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Zorz:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MOSLEY:
You aren't "forced" to buy anything. If you want to play the new content, you have to pay for it. Game dev costs money. That money has to come from somewhere...
this game is f2p.. so f2p players need new content to even if it's not the newest content, but they need new content too.. or game will drop under 20k players like befor they went ftp to get more players ^^
< >
Beiträge 106120 von 281
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rogue:
Dude its $10
dude thats 40$ evey year, that can buy a new game in itself.
You also don't get 10$ worth of anything it's closer to like 4$
Botji 14. Dez. 2019 um 19:11 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rogue:
Dude its $10

I think the point is that for two season passes you can get a decent new game while season passes dont really provide a lot of content so they seem expensive for what they offer. Since im just on the starting line in this game I could be wrong here but season passes only have time limited content, when the next season comes the previous season pass is worthless, right?

What im getting at is that sure, $10 isnt a lot of money for extra content to a game you like, most hobbies costs money but if said content will be removed and you cant or wont play the game a lot then $10 is a lot of money for that extra content.

Im playing with some friends and if we end up sticking with the game im sure we will buy expansions and such but even at that point im skeptical we will every be able to justify buying a season pass, doesnt seem like we will get much from it even if its 'only' $10 to buy them each time.
MOSLEY 14. Dez. 2019 um 19:27 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Botji:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rogue:
Dude its $10

I think the point is that for two season passes you can get a decent new game while season passes dont really provide a lot of content so they seem expensive for what they offer. Since im just on the starting line in this game I could be wrong here but season passes only have time limited content, when the next season comes the previous season pass is worthless, right?

What im getting at is that sure, $10 isnt a lot of money for extra content to a game you like, most hobbies costs money but if said content will be removed and you cant or wont play the game a lot then $10 is a lot of money for that extra content.

Im playing with some friends and if we end up sticking with the game im sure we will buy expansions and such but even at that point im skeptical we will every be able to justify buying a season pass, doesnt seem like we will get much from it even if its 'only' $10 to buy them each time.

If you're just playing the game with friends every once in a while then you probably don't need the season pass. You get access to a few raids for free and you could always get Forsaken or Shadowkeep to permanently increase the number of activities that you access to.

The season passes are intended to give the people who play the game consistently something to do all year round. If they left all of these little activities like vex offensive and the sundial in forever, the game would pretty quickly become a bloated mess.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von MOSLEY; 14. Dez. 2019 um 19:28
Ursprünglich geschrieben von ICE agent:
10 bucks for 3 months of content
Thats 2 less drinks on a weekend

Stupid logic like "its just the price of a burger" is why we have tihs like paid mods from bethesda, $4 skins on games like Marvel Heroes, or... well damn, EA in general.

Time for idiots like you to grasp economic responsibility. John Riciotelli, former CEO of EA, stated that one day, they will be able to charge gamers .10 for a clip of ammo, in a FPS, and they will pay it, because gamers are "price insensitive.... which is a nice way of saying financially irresponsible/stupid.

Congrats sir... you're the prime demographic of these greedy dirtbags.

Price per content.... a $60 AAA game, that took 40-100 people 4-7 years to make, equating to hundreds of thousands of cumulative work hours among the whole group... vs a new shiny weapon, or armor res-skin, that goes for $3-4 on their games DLC page, which only took 1 or 2 guys a DAY to make.

If I haven't hit the point out of the ballpark by now, you're gnickuf hopeless, and deserve to be bent over by these companies, and taken for everything you're worth.
Botji 14. Dez. 2019 um 19:59 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von MOSLEY:
If you're just playing the game with friends every once in a while then you probably don't need the season pass. You get access to a few raids for free and you could always get Forsaken or Shadowkeep to permanently increase the number of activities that you access to.

The season passes are intended to give the people who play the game consistently something to do all year round. If they left all of these little activities like vex offensive and the sundial in forever, the game would pretty quickly become a bloated mess.

So when/if we dont get put off feeling like 2nd tier citizen thanks to how season passes works and seeing countless 'stuff' we wont be able to get... finally we have stuck with the game and bought the DLC which afaik dont seem to have that much too them, what then?
Drop the game because the only new content is put on a timer and behind a paywall?

I mean as a new player, the game is already a bloated mess. Making the scroll bars able to scroll more or adding more pages you can flip through to view everything doesnt seem to be a bad compromise if it means we could pay for more content that stays available, we get more content, they get more money and the game gets more things to scroll or pages to flip through and we dont have to feel like we are missing out on all the new fancy stuff.. games like these are mostly about the new fancy stuff.

Im sure a lot of people with less time to spend on the game would want to be able to get said fancy stuff as well, they might even think its worth paying for.
s0laris 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:08 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mockingcrow:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von ICE agent:
10 bucks for 3 months of content
Thats 2 less drinks on a weekend

Stupid logic like "its just the price of a burger" is why we have tihs like paid mods from bethesda, $4 skins on games like Marvel Heroes, or... well damn, EA in general.

Time for idiots like you to grasp economic responsibility. John Riciotelli, former CEO of EA, stated that one day, they will be able to charge gamers .10 for a clip of ammo, in a FPS, and they will pay it, because gamers are "price insensitive.... which is a nice way of saying financially irresponsible/stupid.

Congrats sir... you're the prime demographic of these greedy dirtbags.

Price per content.... a $60 AAA game, that took 40-100 people 4-7 years to make, equating to hundreds of thousands of cumulative work hours among the whole group... vs a new shiny weapon, or armor res-skin, that goes for $3-4 on their games DLC page, which only took 1 or 2 guys a DAY to make.

If I haven't hit the point out of the ballpark by now, you're gnickuf hopeless, and deserve to be bent over by these companies, and taken for everything you're worth.

Its okay to be poor. If you dont want the new content, no one gonna force you to pay for it. I'll pay to keep the game alive. You are welcome.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von s0laris:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mockingcrow:

Stupid logic like "its just the price of a burger" is why we have tihs like paid mods from bethesda, $4 skins on games like Marvel Heroes, or... well damn, EA in general.

Time for idiots like you to grasp economic responsibility. John Riciotelli, former CEO of EA, stated that one day, they will be able to charge gamers .10 for a clip of ammo, in a FPS, and they will pay it, because gamers are "price insensitive.... which is a nice way of saying financially irresponsible/stupid.

Congrats sir... you're the prime demographic of these greedy dirtbags.

Price per content.... a $60 AAA game, that took 40-100 people 4-7 years to make, equating to hundreds of thousands of cumulative work hours among the whole group... vs a new shiny weapon, or armor res-skin, that goes for $3-4 on their games DLC page, which only took 1 or 2 guys a DAY to make.

If I haven't hit the point out of the ballpark by now, you're gnickuf hopeless, and deserve to be bent over by these companies, and taken for everything you're worth.

Its okay to be poor. If you dont want the new content, no one gonna force you to pay for it. I'll pay to keep the game alive. You are welcome.
This is equivalent to the "dont like it dont play it" argument.
You are also avoiding the point by doing this
Zuletzt bearbeitet von ImmortalSausages; 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:12
ACEsino 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:14 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mockingcrow:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von ICE agent:
10 bucks for 3 months of content
Thats 2 less drinks on a weekend

Stupid logic like "its just the price of a burger" is why we have tihs like paid mods from bethesda, $4 skins on games like Marvel Heroes, or... well damn, EA in general.

Time for idiots like you to grasp economic responsibility. John Riciotelli, former CEO of EA, stated that one day, they will be able to charge gamers .10 for a clip of ammo, in a FPS, and they will pay it, because gamers are "price insensitive.... which is a nice way of saying financially irresponsible/stupid.

Congrats sir... you're the prime demographic of these greedy dirtbags.

Price per content.... a $60 AAA game, that took 40-100 people 4-7 years to make, equating to hundreds of thousands of cumulative work hours among the whole group... vs a new shiny weapon, or armor res-skin, that goes for $3-4 on their games DLC page, which only took 1 or 2 guys a DAY to make.

If I haven't hit the point out of the ballpark by now, you're gnickuf hopeless, and deserve to be bent over by these companies, and taken for everything you're worth.
Ok boomer
Wants seasonal content. Doesn't want to pay for it.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von I Love Cats:
Wants seasonal content. Doesn't want to pay for it.
If you dont pay up in time in a game you already spent $100-$200 on, you miss out on a lot of weapons, activities, and in this season, a really interesting questline involving an iconic character in the game.

You wanna know why this is not acceptable? Because a non triple A company called Digital Extremes is continuing to provide tons of free content (that isnt limited time) in a free game that has been going on for more than 6 years. If DE can do this, then bungie can give players at least some content without asking them to fork over even more money
Zuletzt bearbeitet von ImmortalSausages; 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:40
Kei 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:31 
Reading through all these worthless discussions is giving me a headache.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von succulents:
The entire concept of this thread is the most dense and brainless thing I've ever come across on the internet

Ursprünglich geschrieben von reminisce:
Reading through all these worthless discussions is giving me a headache.
Cant contribute anything meaningful to the discussion so instead tries to act like the bigger man by saying that this discussion is petty
Zuletzt bearbeitet von ImmortalSausages; 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:51
okbet 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:45 
The entire concept of this thread is the most dense and brainless thing I've ever come across on the internet
Snowfox 14. Dez. 2019 um 20:48 
They need to make money somehow to keep servers up and well, have a job? And no they cant make enough off of eververse alone. AND the dlc in destiny 1 wasnt free, all of them were paid. They already made the game F2P so dont complain
< >
Beiträge 106120 von 281
Pro Seite: 1530 50

Geschrieben am: 14. Dez. 2019 um 8:01
Beiträge: 281