Arma 3
Are the flight physics in Arma 3 realistic?
Does anyone here have any flight experance, sims, airforce, rc... ect?
< >
Beiträge 1630 von 56
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Captain Sum Ting Wong:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Musashi:

Oh, man the DCS UH-1 is a pilots wet dream come true (even in the current state). I love it! But also A-10c etc. The game engine is getting old, still serves its purpose.

But, sometimes, I also just want to "fly for fun" - ARMA III is good for that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgdbUCw7pqY

Just like you sometimes want to drive a real sports car, sometimes iRacing & sometimes Dirt 2? Each one has its place.
Ya, I love flying in arma 3 and listining to music. Ps downloading dcs free right now

beware of DCS free, you wont be able to manipulate any of the inner controls of the plane via the mouse. That you have to pay for. With DCS world you get a single plane to just mess around in. For about 29-30$ you buy a CD key to download from them the other planes (Start with the huey and blackshark for choppers)
Arma never had physics and i think never will have.
Nats 17. Okt. 2013 um 5:46 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Captain Sum Ting Wong:
I am looking to get into some flight simulators to see what pilots really feel behind the controls. I have heard fsx is good and xp 10, but what would you recomend. Also, im looking for the most realistic simulator possible that is under $100( I have heard some can be $1000 up :O).

FSX is the best civilian flight simulator on PC there is, its a wonderful game as well as somewhere you can learn to fly without taking expensive lessons - it actually has a realistic flight course in the game. Certainly when I took control of a glider the knowledge gained in FSX came is very useful.

ARMA2's planes and helicopters leave a lot to be desired and I find it more difficult flying them than planes and helicopters in 'proper' sims.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Nats; 17. Okt. 2013 um 5:47
I'm a military pilot (don't ask which service)...in short..no, this game isn't even close to the real thing. Even the flight simulators are off. And in all honesty, I'm glad it's not even 50% realistic...Less stress that way. Today's aircraft rely heavily on onboard computers which is something that even the best PC flight sims always get wrong. I can never shoot an approach correctly in a flight sim (for practice purposes) because the onboard computers in the PC sim are not even close to the real thing. If you're looking to shoot approaches using the old school steam gauges then the PC sims start to shine in that respect.

If I could just get in my aircraft, flip 1 switch and launch (Like in Arma), that would be amazing. Instead I have a preflight checklist, before start checklist, start-up checklist, after start checklist, pre taxi checks, taxi checks, run up check list, op check list, before take off checklists, after take off checks, another ops check, before climb checklists, enroute checklists, descent checklist, before landing checklist, after landing checks, taxi checks, ops check again, and engine shutdown checklist. Then when you're out of the aircraft you have to inspect the whole thing before signing it back to the squadron.

Each checklist is typically 20-30 steps and many of them are expected to be done from memory. And while you're doing these checklists you're expected to communicate with ATC (air traffic control), talk to your co-pilot and crew, and keep a constant scan of your instruments (in case autopilot does something weird and tries to kill you).

So please keep flying simple, it's better this way. :)
Ursprünglich geschrieben von spanishsurfer:
I'm a military pilot (don't ask which service)...in short..no, this game isn't even close to the real thing. Even the flight simulators are off. And in all honesty, I'm glad it's not even 50% realistic...Less stress that way. Today's aircraft rely heavily on onboard computers which is something that even the best PC flight sims always get wrong. I can never shoot an approach correctly in a flight sim (for practice purposes) because the onboard computers in the PC sim are not even close to the real thing. If you're looking to shoot approaches using the old school steam gauges then the PC sims start to shine in that respect.

If I could just get in my aircraft, flip 1 switch and launch (Like in Arma), that would be amazing. Instead I have a preflight checklist, before start checklist, start-up checklist, after start checklist, pre taxi checks, taxi checks, run up check list, op check list, before take off checklists, after take off checks, another ops check, before climb checklists, enroute checklists, descent checklist, before landing checklist, after landing checks, taxi checks, ops check again, and engine shutdown checklist. Then when you're out of the aircraft you have to inspect the whole thing before signing it back to the squadron.

Each checklist is typically 20-30 steps and many of them are expected to be done from memory. And while you're doing these checklists you're expected to communicate with ATC (air traffic control), talk to your co-pilot and crew, and keep a constant scan of your instruments (in case autopilot does something weird and tries to kill you).

So please keep flying simple, it's better this way. :)

Sorry but no, simulators are quite highly on the ball, so much infact the simulator still used to train pilots is an updated flight sim X. To let you know, all that robotic stuff you are trained to do is for the insurence of the vehicle as you do not own it thus the person who bought it wants to make sure every time you use it you perform that ritual. to actually start a helicopter or airplane and take off is rather easy.

flight Sim X does fine with approches, put enough traffic and you will be doing alot of waiting. You also with Flight sim X have full control over the vehicle dependent on choice ( the 747 for example all its switches work and provide function). DCS warthog is another great example it simulates everything identical minus the radio (its for online)

Even the Huey can be started in about 30 seconds in a hurry. Today computers might have taken over, but you must remember you control that plane first, the computer does it second.

Dude i feel sorry for you military guys. By the time you finsh starting and checking all that worthless nonsense (if your plane is maintained, half of those checks are useless) i will have started mine, taken off and gotton far away long before you even taxied to the runway.

There is a saying in the civilian world. It should take you no more than 5-7 minutes from the starting of the plane, to taking off. of all my years of flying ive yet to have a single issue with all the planes ive flown.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von oldwrld; 17. Okt. 2013 um 6:21
Like I said, PC sims are good if you're looking for practice with the old stuff, like Cessnas and Piper Warriors, etc...but the minute you start trying to fly an advanced aircraft (Like a 747) the PC Sim isn't even close. I've talked about this in length with plenty of friends of mine (Who are now Fedex and UPS pilots) and we all agree on this. Even the 10 million dollar simulators are only about 90% accurate.

Opening the fuel flow and starting the magneto....and checklists are rather dumb to follow...So you don't fly professionally? And you're probably restricted to VFR correct? I can understand how you would think that PC flight sims are on the ball, since they cater to the VFR only type (Which is no dig on you).
Ursprünglich geschrieben von spanishsurfer:
Like I said, PC sims are good if you're looking for practice with the old stuff, like Cessnas and Piper Warriors, etc...but the minute you start trying to fly an advanced aircraft (Like a 747) the PC Sim isn't even close. I've talked about this in length with plenty of friends of mine (Who are now Fedex and UPS pilots) and we all agree on this. Even the 10 million dollar simulators are only about 90% accurate.

Opening the fuel flow and starting the magneto....and checklists are rather dumb to follow...So you don't fly professionally? And you're probably restricted to VFR correct? I can understand how you would think that PC flight sims are on the ball, since they cater to the VFR only type (Which is no dig on you).

90% accurate is better than 30%. Also a couple of mods normally fix that last 10% (mods always fix everything). Trained on both VFR and IFR (had to learn it to fly at night and in heavy storms). 12 years flying experience though not nearly as many hours as some of the pros who work like robots at times.

and yes any experienced pilot outside a professional company knows those checklists are no good if you actually understand flying more so than just checklists. You think i dont check my plane? i can do your checklist on my plane in around a minute as after all i maintain the plane so i know each time i get in, that it will perform to my expectations. The only time annoyances show up is with the ATC controller who sometimes is just a little too slow on giving me permission to go when im clearly sitting here waiting and on my radar i dont see anything comming in.

That ritual you guys are taught in the military if for politics mostly. In wars ive read checklists not even being followed, the pilots just knew what to do and when to do it.

Also FEDEX and UPS both are doing those ritual for the same reason you are, to keep the boss's happy about their investments. When you fly private you never need to worry about the politics. Just keep the plane maintained and the paperwork in order and the FAA pisses off.

As one who enjoys DCS warthog, that is the only plane where i cannot start it in under 2 minutes. (jet has totally different rules, a royal pain at times comming from a prop my whole life but i learned its the same prinicple but with jet engines, granted starting those Engines is annoying at times i hate the APU) For that pig yes, its a pig it requires 2-4 minutes to start it. The checklist is longer but if you understand the plane a little it aint so bad. Nowadays i can start that pig from its off position in around 2-3 minutes assuming the plane is nice and actually obeys me (that thing is as touchy as a buick at times even following the checklist)
Zuletzt bearbeitet von oldwrld; 17. Okt. 2013 um 6:46
I've been trained by guys who flew F4s in Vietnam, F15s during the Gulf Storm, Tomcats in the 80s, flew P3s near Russia, Coast Guard heli and Herc pilots, guys with over 12,000 hours in a plane... in other words, the worlds best pilots and not one time have I EVER heard them say that checklists should be disregarded. In fact they always preached the opposite "Never take shortcuts" is what they always said. For someone who does not fly professionally you have a high opinion of your beliefs, which are wreckless when you fly big, complicated planes, with a crew onboard.

Its like someone who drives go karts for fun trying to give advice to a guy who drives in NASCAR or Formula 1, we live by different codes for good reason.

And we're off topic, my point was that Arma flight mechanics are simple and should be kept that way.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von spanishsurfer:
I've been trained by guys who flew F4s in Vietnam, F15s during the Gulf Storm, Tomcats in the 80s, flew P3s near Russia, Coast Guard heli and Herc pilots, guys with over 12,000 hours in a plane... in other words, the worlds best pilots and not one time have I EVER heard them say that checklists should be disregarded. In fact they always preached the opposite "Never take shortcuts" is what they always said. For someone who does not fly professionally you have a high opinion of your beliefs, which are wreckless when you fly big, complicated planes, with a crew onboard.

Its like someone who drives go karts for fun trying to give advice to a guy who drives in NASCAR or Formula 1, we live by different codes for good reason.

And we're off topic, my point was that Arma flight mechanics are simple and should be kept that way.

again military pilots, all of them follow politics meaning they will defend that checklist to the death as they were taught. Of course military dont take shortcuts, they are the miltary meaning politics control all even how you fly that plane.

I was merely stating that only people who care about the checklist, are political military pilots, or worse civilian pilots with the mindset if they follow the rules to the letter, they might get something out of it *face palm*.

The largest plane ive flown was with a crew of 3 and we all knew exactly what to do and never had to do the checklist in a tradtional sense. The flight Engineer did his task exactly as i expected, and i did mine as the co-pilot. The captain himself didnt even do the checklist but rather did everything from experience as he put it when i asked about the checklist (when i was a newbie) and yet we took off no issue, performed the task with no issue and returned the plane without a single issue.


We were all professional during that time, but we were not going to act like robots though all of us were trained that way.

Ive even had it when in flight school the teacher had me up at 10,000 and basically stalled the plane and said "You figure it out" i looked at him like he was nuts but i got the message quickly and learned my first lesson about that checklist getting me killed if i followed it all the time. The teacher set it up so even though i followed the checklist to the letter, the plane would not recover and after a while i saw his little trick and leveled off at 8000 once fixing it and i got this message and i wont forget it "That list is there to protect the company and your passangers nothing more, you yourself are responsible for the plane, not this damn list" meaning exactly that, if had no idea how to handle the plane other than through that checklist system then i was not worth the license i was trying to achieve. I would never teach how i was taught (with politics these days you cant learn the way i did)
Zuletzt bearbeitet von oldwrld; 17. Okt. 2013 um 7:02
*Sigh...
Ursprünglich geschrieben von spanishsurfer:
*Sigh...

you can sigh if you wish. Military pilots are all the same. I know my uncle is one he too defends that checklist.
Statistically, more people live in the long run [and less aircraft destroyed] if checklists are followed. I'd rather fly with spanishsurfer than Not Slim Shady.

If under a time crunch during an emergency that would result in a worse chance for survival if taking too long, then that is when I'd take my chances with pilots like Not Slim Shady.
oldwrld 17. Okt. 2013 um 11:04 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Modaflanker:
Statistically, more people live in the long run [and less aircraft destroyed] if checklists are followed. I'd rather fly with spanishsurfer than Not Slim Shady.

If under a time crunch during an emergency that would result in a worse chance for survival if taking too long, then that is when I'd take my chances with pilots like Not Slim Shady.

By the time you finsh the checklist, and figure out the problem i would have already been finshed thanks to actual experience and understanding of my plane. Those who spend all that time on checklists do so either because they arent confident in their flying, or worse they dont trust the plane given to them or last but not least, their boss's who bought the plane basically made it so because of that investment if you dont follow those checklists well you're basically disrespecting their property

When push comes to shove, you should understand your plane enough not to need that checklist. Do you think WW2 pilots used checklists when their planes gave them trouble? not a chance they actually understood why the plane was messing up from reading of the gauges and the feel of the plane. These days thanks to computers no one actually "Flies" anymore.

How i miss the 70's
Zuletzt bearbeitet von oldwrld; 17. Okt. 2013 um 11:05
Garrett 17. Okt. 2013 um 11:16 
Many commercial pilots, and I know this from experience, check all systems on board their jets before takeoff. If they didn't, I would've died years ago in a plane crash instead of having a delayed flight.
oldwrld 17. Okt. 2013 um 11:37 
Ursprünglich geschrieben von The Doctor NRFJC:
Many commercial pilots, and I know this from experience, check all systems on board their jets before takeoff. If they didn't, I would've died years ago in a plane crash instead of having a delayed flight.

again politics play everything in flight involving passangers and the military. private pilots know how to do the checklist, without doing the checklist if you will. When you hear of a pilot reading off the list, that happens in professional envrioments where people watch closely.

I would rather the pro check his plane before he leaves too, but i know he too does the list rather quickly and sometimes avoids one or two and does em from memory. As i said learn your plane you wont need that list nearly as much.
< >
Beiträge 1630 von 56
Pro Seite: 1530 50

Geschrieben am: 15. Okt. 2013 um 20:42
Beiträge: 56