Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also put Arma on the SSD you'll get smoother processing of the game.
With only 8 GB or RAM the only time (if even then) you will see 60 FPS or better is when you are on foot. As soon as you get into a vehicle, your FPS will plummet and forget about flying helicopters or jets. Even with a viewing distance set below 2 km, you would find the game very frustrating to play.
As Gunter Severloh mentioned, you really want a minimum of 16 GB. More would be even better.
Arma III is not graphically demanding, so even very old video cards will work just fine. However, Arma III is an unbalanced memory hog. Most of the work is done by just a couple of cores and a handful of threads. So the more physical RAM you can throw at it, the better the performance will be.
I also hope you do not have those 109 mods all active at the same time when you start the game. There is no reason to have more than 20 or 30 mods loaded at one time, unless you are creating missions. Mods consume memory, and for every active mods it means a lower FPS.
Okay this is my plan:
1. Get MSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI if I want ryzen processor, or Mortar if I want intel processor
2. Get new processor either Intel I7 9700KF or ryzen 5 3600 (They are same price here in my country)
3. Get another 8 gb or ram
4. Get SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS NVME 256gb disk to store Arma 3
My question is:
1, Will this improve my fps drastically and is it worth it?
2. Is it better to get Intel or ryzen processor (processor will be chosen based on whats better for arma Arma 3)
16 GB of RAM is definitely what I would recommend to be your minimum. You will be able to set your viewing distance to between 2 and 2.5 km, and still get 60+ FPS while on foot or in a vehicle. You will drop to ~40 FPS, or maybe even lower, when flying, but it is still playable - barely. Overall, I think you will enjoy the experience better with 16 GB of RAM.
1 - It will certainly improve your FPS, at least to the point where the game becomes enjoyable to play rather than a frustrating experience. I do consider it worth it. I upgraded my own PC to 32 GB of RAM in 2019 specifically to improve my performance with Arma III. It improved it so much that I'm now considering upgrading to 64 GB.
2 - Personally, I would go with the Intel I7 instead of the AMD CPU. I'm currently running a Ryzen 7 3700X and I'm having compatibility issues - not with Arma III, but with other software.
Upgrade dont setting for 16gb that minimum, let me say that again, thats minimum enough to get you over the hump and the game playable.
Spend the money, if you are a dedicated fan of the series like myself, an investment once every few or more years wont hurt you, if your going to spend a sh*t ton of time in the game then make sure its worth your time and the best time you have. Enjoying the experience is what its about, you'll create some great memories that way.
ya my game plays good.
I have Arma 3 only on an SSD by itself, and my OS on its own, then any other games
i have on other SSD's.
My cpu is i7-700k 4.20ghz
Gpu Nvidia RTX 2060 12gb
Ram 4 8gb sticks = 32gb
1000watt psu
i average 50-110 depends on the map, and mission, but most games is fine.
On weekends i play coop with a group and we use up to 20 mods, missions are heavy but
on them i average 60+ ok so ya SSD, Ram and good cpu is important.