Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Battleye never failed on me.
But I would like to see them use VAC.
Never left here, banned for speaking the truth in there. Caugh a developer lying and made him accountable, asked him about it and he went silent, then moderador pm´d me saying if i kept calling them liars i would be banned, i asked for a synonim for someone that said something untrue on purpose, or answers, and he said if i kept at it i would be banned. I don´t give a ♥♥♥♥ about being banned on a private company forum ran by teenagers, i´m doing people a favor so they are able to hear something other than fanboy ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
And they closed the biggest topic on the forum about the biggest performance issue on this game. They couldnt argue against me in the first place so they stupidly called me a troll in order for less enlightened fanboys know their excuse for banning me.
One thing anyone knows, the recommended specs for this game is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. They care about only one thing, get peoples money for a rushed game that is milking ArmA´s brand name, will come to a point that even fanboys will get past denial. Dean Hall said it, "ArmA 3 supports LESS players and LESS ai than ArmA 2" and still they say ArmA 3 has better performance. is a joke.
But guess what, they used to say that noone could call them out on performance issues because it was an alpha, well, now alpha is over and what i said from day 1 stands.
Maybe you shouldn't of downloaded "Free Hacks" off the internet and your CD key wouldn't of been stolen.
dwarden said no games scale well with multicore or have high usage across all cores while saying arma engine is already multicore implyign that it already makes proper use of multicore processors, which makes it a lie since the main game and the ai that account for most of the cpu power needed use each only 1 thread, so both don´t use more than 2 cores, yeah they filled other cores with physx and clouds, great improvement. others said that the reason they wont go for 64bit is because they want legacy with old hardware, which is a lie since the game requires dx10 and need current gen cpus in order to perform well. arma 2 wasnt all that optimized, people bought better cpus over the years that´s why it got acceptable, but to this day it still suffers from the same issues that now ArmA 3 suffers on online play with a lot of players and ai. dwarden was proven wrong on the forum, and i directly asked him questions about his statements, he never replied with an answer for more than 2 months, thats when i got tired of all their evasive empty statements and called him out saying he was a liar, nothing changed and he remained silent.
Those things i mentioned aren´t bugs and can´t be optimized, its the core of their engine. The reason they remain silent is because they can´t do anything about it but be quiet, pretend its nothing and let people buy their game anyway, and that´s why they announced a blog about it, to make excuses about the bad online performance. The entire gaming industry is going towards more cores, specially now with 8 cores consoles. It´s not a problem having a 10 year old engine, it becomes a problem when it´s not updated to use current hardware. The game isn´t cpu intensive, the game simply does not use more than 2 cores properly, and that won´t change because this kind of thing is altered at max in alpha. the "it´s only an alpha" excuse was just stalling, and since they have plenty of fanboys defendign them, they won´t be held accountable for it. people with better than recommended specs will keep complaining about fps and other users will keep telling them to try dangerous overclocks or buy $500 cpus for a game that could run very well on $100 ones.
Rocket stating that ArmA 3 is worse and ArmA 2, when he works for bohemia and has access to its developers and the code was the last straw, they are fulyl aware of the engines limitations and simply prefer to launch a rushed game than fix it. Like Rocket said, they are reworking the engine for DayZ SA, but ArmA 3 is ArmA 2 with new dx support.
so this argument against BE is dismissed ... BE does extremely well against cheaters ...
Not really. I literally just downloaded a few mod files I needed for a server and was globally banned for it. None of the mods were cheats. When I contacted Bohemia for help they sent me to battle eye who did not even respond to me. BE is ♥♥♥♥.