Differences between EMR, ABR, and original Mk-14?

[Snips]

Other than design/ skin, I'm unaware if there's any difference. If we take BI's claim of barrel length to mean anything, the Rahim should outperform them all due to bullpup design, but I'm unsure of comparisons between themselves. Likewise, has the katiba eeked out any advantages over the MX class?

[Nythra]

I can say the katiba is a better assault rifle than the mx

[xPhantom G]

Yeah, Katiba is the superior rifle over the MX, most notable is the lack of recoil compared to the MX, and the fact that you have compatible magazines when fighting against the CSAT, looting bodies for ammo when you can, unlike the MX.

[Nythra]

Originally posted by xPhantom GenesisX:

Yeah, Katiba is the superior rifle over the MX, most notable is the lack of recoil compared to the MX, and the fact that you have compatible magazines when fighting against the CSAT, looting bodies for ammo when you can, unlike the MX.

Also more damage /stopping power. It feels like a 6.5, the mx feels more like a 5.56.

[StormhawkV]

The Katiba has a higher rate of fire than the MX but is less accurate. Mk14 is heavier than Rahim, ABR is heavier than Mk14 and the EMR needs a fix. It's way too heavy and powerful for a 7,62mm rifle.

[Nythra]

Originally posted by StormhawkV:

The Katiba has a higher rate of fire than the MX but is less accurate. Mk14 is heavier than Rahim, ABR is heavier than Mk14 and the EMR needs a fix. It's way too heavy and powerful for a 7,62mm rifle.

Actually i feel is more accurate at longer distances than the mx. I can hit targets with iron sights at 200+ meters.

[Marty]

Originally posted by StormhawkV:

The Katiba has a higher rate of fire than the MX but is less accurate. Mk14 is heavier than Rahim, ABR is heavier than Mk14 and the EMR needs a fix. It's way too heavy and powerful for a 7,62mm rifle.

You do know that the 7.62x51mm NATO stopping power is on par with the 7.62x39mm AK rifle round? Small entry hole and behind that everything is jellified. A 7.62 battle rifle is supposed to be dangerous .

[StormhawkV]

Originally posted by Velpecula:

Actually i feel is more accurate at longer distances than the mx. I can hit targets with iron sights at 200+ meters.

I think it's supposed to be more precise than the standard MX, but it seems as if its bullets fly way too fast.

Originally posted by Let's eat KFC in Baltimore! :D:

You do know that the 7.62x51mm NATO stopping power is on par with the 7.62x39mm AK rifle round? Small entry hole and behind that everything is jellified. A 7.62 battle rifle is supposed to be dangerous .

Compare it to the other 7,62mm rifles in ArmA 3. Its performance is closer to the MAR-10 than the ABR.