Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I have read all about Arma using single core. I like Intel and have never owned an AMD. But, This CPU is what I have to work with for now.
It was this part
"On mutliplayer i can confirm that this cpu is crap"
99.9% of mutliplayer servers are crap,not the cpu,no matter what brand/model of cpu
"I can confirm that intel fanboys are idiots" says the idiot to another idiot ....
If you want play with stable fps above 20, i recommend a i5 / i7 or you wait until they release the map dlc, this includes a free update graphic(dx12) update for everyone. I hope that will fix all the performance issues
http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/arma-3-expansion-show-stunning-graphics-dx12-more-32157318/
""On mutliplayer i can confirm that this cpu is crap"
99.9% of mutliplayer servers are crap,not the cpu,no matter what brand/model of cpu"
Every "idiot" can host a server, the performance is based how to handle the scripts and the AI.
I played missions with about 150 ACTIVE AIs and the server had fps about 30-35 .....
Sry that i dont used more gentle words for it. But with the FX-8350 CPU you dont have much fun on arma mp matches.
Iam not a fanboy of intel or amd, if you read my post carefully you see that i use both products. I have currently 6 PCs with Two INTEL CPUs (i7 4790k and xeon 1220v3)
and four AMD CPUs (FX-8350, X6 1055T, AMD APU 5350 and Phenom X4 9850BE).
The sad truth is, currently AMD has no CPU i would suggest for ArmA 3. Even the high insane overlocked AMD FX-9590 CPU which requires a watercooling are useless. Even an old i5 2500 beats the entire AMD line up, and that CPU a few years old.
Here are some rare benchmarks:
http://gamegpu.ru/images/remote/http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-ARMA_III-test-a3_proz.jpg
I Hope this change next year, when AMD comes up with the new zen cpu's and since INTEL has no intrest in putting out new high end cpu's next year it could be very intresting.
Granted 1100 of those are playing Breaking Point and for good reason
No server I have eve4r played on can match the fps I get there
If playing without less then 20fps is good for you, then iam happy for you.
(btw i have +10k hours of arma gameplay)
*FACEPALM*
If you know how the script system works,... but his answer aahhhh ...
Reading stupid posts from people who only playing zombie mods, why bohemia why ....
Last post for me, get a intel and be happy
I have an idea how the script system works.
Is it the difference between a crap fps server and a good one?
LoL at the milsim player,the very reason I stop playing the Milsim part of Arma