Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't understand the need for a spreadsheet...if you know the distance to a target, zero to said target, aim center mass, and fire. If needed, adjust aim/zero and fire again.
I'm not sure, but I really don't think the video settings has any adjustment on how the game ballistics work.
Maybe try a different long range optic?
I made the spreadsheet due to the m320 .408 shots not landing quite where I can predict. I tested out ranges such as 300, 325, 350, 375... all the way through 2675m testing diferences in 25, 50, 75 meters.
I found that shots at exactly 300, 400, 500 meters are not where the center of the crosshair is even if zerod. It hits just a small bit down about -1/3 mils. for 325, 425, 525 meters the shot landed about -7/10 mildots down. for the 350, 450 and 550 meters the hits were about -1 1/5 mils down. In conclusion I thought that shots would hit more accurately when using the mil dots being -1 mil down +50m and half a mil dot being +25m.