Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What about the line infantry? Did they act like that? No, they would hold their fire unless told to.
Looks like somebody struck a nerve with this one.
^^^^^^^^^^^ IRL + a Unit
"...I never heard a unit (IRL) act like that..."
It's worth noting that by using the "this is not the line infantry era" argument, Agent441 moved the goalpost from "any unit" to "any unit in the modern era", resulting in a very obvious contradiction of his previous argument. Remember that Arma III can, through mods, simulate warfare as far back as the Franco-Prussian war, so line infantry is very much fair game in the grand scheme of things.
He didn't specify the Era
Exactly. I know it sounds like something only suitable in a courtroom, but if you want to win a debate on a forum you have to lock down your statements like you are a Lawyer.
He should expand his vocabulary so he can specify simple subjects.