this game is fun but trash

[Jin Yoichi]

sadly there's no other like it, so we're forced to play this half assed joke cus that's what this is..... this game runs BADLY and the developers do nothing about it

[CW2 P. Larkins]

Yes.

[Cryptic]

no.

[Scrub]

Arma is popular because there's nothing else like it on the market, so they get away with a lot. I love arma and it's a decent game, but like all arma games it lacks polish. If a new mil sim came out with decent AI and better performance people would switch in a heartbeat.

[SlayerSenpai777]

the fact that this early 2010's game consistently runs sub-60fps on my rig is ridiculous.
I can boot up something like DOOM Eternal everything maxed out and get at least 100+fps

[Cryptic]

Originally posted by Scrub:

Arma is popular because there's nothing else like it on the market, so they get away with a lot. I love arma and it's a decent game, but like all arma games it lacks polish. If a new mil sim came out with decent AI and better performance people would switch in a heartbeat.

agreed

[Paradox1126]

Originally posted by SlayerSenpai777:

the fact that this early 2010's game consistently runs sub-60fps on my rig is ridiculous.
I can boot up something like DOOM Eternal everything maxed out and get at least 100+fps

I have a constant run in with another player about this all the time. I have an i7-4770 with a 2080. I can run everything I have at ultra or high with no problems. Even DCS runs rather perfect for me. I want a solid 60 frames but there's no way I'm upgrading my specs just for one game.

I'm getting 20 solid frames on their latest dlc. Ruins the whole experience

[опытный стрелок]

It will only get worse, they are focusing more on multi core CPU builds instead of single core performance. Arma 3 will be left in the dust soon. We need a whole new engine with multi core support that uses all of the gpu. The Mil version of Arma 3, vbs 3 can have 5000 Ai working at once and 12 km view distance and a solid 60 fps. BISIM should help Bohemia and write a whole new engine.

[Zothen]

Originally posted by SlayerSenpai777:

the fact that this early 2010's game consistently runs sub-60fps on my rig is ridiculous.
I can boot up something like DOOM Eternal everything maxed out and get at least 100+fps

*facepalm* Kids these days....
Apples, Bananas.. spot the difference.

[CalicoJack]

Originally posted by Zothen:

Originally posted by SlayerSenpai777:

the fact that this early 2010's game consistently runs sub-60fps on my rig is ridiculous.
I can boot up something like DOOM Eternal everything maxed out and get at least 100+fps

*facepalm* Kids these days....
Apples, Bananas.. spot the difference.

its ridiculous

[Ludicrous_Speed]

They're doing nothing about the performance because I doubt there is much they can do without severely overhauling the game as a whole, which would be rather pointless given the inevitable 4th game looming over the horizon.

The game runs bad because the engine it's built on is bad, pretty plain and simple. And it's so bad that the devs for DayZ straight up moved that game onto a completely new engine rather than trying to fix the current one.

[Duke_44]

If there was literally any comparable (large scale PvE-focused simulation) game, i would jump over with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ glee

[CalicoJack]

Originally posted by Duke:

If there was literally any comparable (large scale PvE-focused simulation) game, i would jump over with ♥♥♥♥♥♥ glee

maybe its not soooo easy to create what Arma3 delivers 🤔

[опытный стрелок]

Use the engine from this but first person...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2DH27tA_vo

[Duke_44]

Originally posted by Меченый:

Use the engine from this but first person...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2DH27tA_vo

That's not how that works
That's not how anything works!

[ryanberry]

I can assure you that BIS has done everything within their power to make Arma 3 run as smoothly as possible. The engine is like 15+ years old. And yes, the FPS is not as good as other games, but other games aren't as good as Arma 3.