Warlords hackers are out of control.

[опытный стрелок]

Warlords is just never ending hacking by players. I fast-travel to Sagonisi harbour and I am killed by rockets from a Kajman from 2800m away. This is BS. OPFOR have a Shikra, a Yak-130 and a Xian and they are just dominating and there is nothing you can do about it. This is BS. A 6 year old game with no hacker protection or anti-cheat at all. Except Battleeye, which is outdated. This should be fixed somehow. Maybe permabans to scare the hackers off.

I have only seen Battleeye ban one person in the whole time I have been playing, and only because they were using detected hacks. Everyone else uses undetected hacks now.

[Capt.ZappBrannigain]

Yeah its all just one big troll fest, dudes get toxic cause the air OP in altis warlord but no one want to play any other maps!!!! Dudes turn off termal sig on tigris, make ♥♥♥♥ invincible and are still using shoulder fired full auto guided rockets!

[Cipher]

you forget that there's uav lasers?
those things help extend the weapon range by a lot

[Timbercock]

Warlords has so many ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ things to it. Blufor having the worst ground vehicles and 2 airfields that are easy to camp. Blufor having the most sectors to cap that dont even give a lot of CP etc.

And also auto turrets blocking caps, back capping runing some sessions as it gets way too tedious.
And yet i still play it

[zeeb]

Originally posted by Меченый:

I am killed by rockets from a Kajman from 2800m away

I stopped reading after this.

Do yourself a favor and read up on the weaponry of the Kajman.
Particularly the Skalpel rocket: https://armedassault.fandom.com/wiki/Dynamic_loadouts#Skalpel

Maximum lock-on range: 6 km

The Skyfire rockets doesn't even have a max range in theory since they're "fire & forget", even if they're 'short-range air-to-ground rockets'.
(Now they might lose thrust after a while, but that doesn't mean it just disappears, it still has speed to use. I can't be bothered to check the actual values on it, do that yourself, but hitting something 3km away shouldn't be a problem)

Its main gun have zeroing up to 2500m, which means you can fire beyond that.

Every armament the Kajman has can reach 2800m+.


Just a salty thread due to being outplayed, learn to lose because you can't always win.
Be better next time and learn from your losses.

[zeeb]

Originally posted by Deletd:

Blufor having the worst ground vehicles and 2 airfields that are easy to camp

I always camp OPFOR's airfields as BLUFOR and I find that extremely easy, I usually only spend about 2k to get there and that nets us a 30k benefit since I carry 3 AA rockets which is 3 jets. (Then you just resupply until the enemy team does something about it)
Both sides can be equally camped.

Warlords is a game about the CP after all, which team uses their economy with the most efficiency.

Don't forget that BLUFOR has the Rhino, which is the strongest asset in Warlords, so it doesn't matter if OPFOR has the Shikra, Kajman or T140K Angara.
(You don't need any of these anyway, it's just luxury, a good player can do equally well in the BLUFOR counterparts, but anyone can do well in a Rhino)

Originally posted by Deletd:

Blufor having the most sectors to cap that dont even give a lot of CP etc.

Why in the world would you cap all the useless sectors as either team?
The goal is to rush Anthrakia and fortify it, both teams has the same amount of sectors to reach Anthrakia, which is a chokepoint.

First team to capture and successfully hold Anthrakia and push beyond it wins the game 90% of the time.

The biggest noob mistake is to do the opposite (capturing the useless sectors) since the other team will get there first.

Originally posted by Deletd:

back capping

This I agree with, it is annoying and should definitely be patched.
You should only be able to capture the sector that has been voted for attack.
But if a team gets cut off, they should get a free sector vote reset.