Differences Between The MRAPs

[stuv101]

Did some fun testing with the three main MRAPs in Arma 3 to find differences and advantages between them.

survive = able to repair and use again later, not exploded and burning.
I tested all MRAPs against 7.62 marksman rifles, SPMG .338, Navid 9.3, Lynx snipers, small IEDs, Explosive Charges, and RPG-7

The Hunter

• The Hunter provides the best armor protection against small arms fire with it's smaller port windows and better armor, SPMG .338 and Navid 9.3 failed to penetrate the Hunter's hull (7.62 marksman rifles were able to penetrate through both the Ifrit and Strider sides, it took about 7 shots to kill 1 crew member. 12.7 will go though the armor off all three MRAPs)
  
  
• The Hunter is the only U.S. standard layout MRAP (driver on the left hand side). Both the Strider and Ifrit have the driver directly in the front center of the vehicle.
  
  
• The Hunter is the ony MRAP not equipped with counter-measures.

The Ifrit

• The ifrit is the only MRAP capable of surviving an explosive charge or small IED detonation directly underneath the vehicle. (both the Hunter and Strider explode right after an IED or Explosive charge detonates underneath them)
  
  
• The Ifrit is equipped with smoke counter-measures (activated with default key: C), that shoot out 7 smoke grenades out in a crecent circle infront of the vehicle.
  
  
• Due to the Ifrit's sloped design, the front windshield is able to withstand multiple shots from both 7.62 and even 12.7 armor piercing (the windshield will fail from 7.62 if shot from above); giving high visibility for the driver (big window) while maintaining protection.
  
  
• The Ifrit is the only MRAP to have an alternate camo pattern (Green Hex)
  
  
• The Ifrit is the only MRAP that DOESN'T have any rearview mirror or backup camera, only side mirrors

The Strider

• The Strider had double the weight capacity (inventory) of any MRAP, able to carry up to 8 lynx sniper rifles, as opposed to 4 in both the Ifrat and Hunter
  
  
• The Strider is the only Amphibious MRAP in the game, able to cross water ways at 13 kph
  
  
• The Strider is the only MRAP with a commander position that has an extendable periscope camera (this camera is equipped with a laser designator)
  
  
• The Strider is equipped with smoke counter-measures (activated with default key: C), that shoot out 7 smoke grenades out in a crecent circle infront of the vehicle (only usable by commander position).

[AAB_EAGLE]

-hg- stuv101 の投稿を引用：

Did some fun testing with the three main MRAPs in Arma 3 to find differences and advantages between them. [/h1 survive = able to repair and use again later, not exploded and burning.
I tested all MRAPs against 7.62 marksman rifles, SPMG .338, Navid 9.3, Lynx snipers, small IEDs, Explosive Charges, and RPG-7

[stuv101]

In the hunter thats why you shoot the glass not the hull

That's why the hunter in my opinion is the best MRAP against small arms ambushes, the windows are way smaller than either the Ifrat or the Strider. Good lush shooting and killing the driver or gunner in a moving Hunter. It's weakness is in explosives, one explosive charge or small IED detonating under it and you've practically killed the entire crew.

[Falconpolat]

İFRİT looks more cooler than all

[Tree™]

It's Ifrit - not Ifrat

[El Berl]

Strider is the best all-around thanks to its ability to go on water, which helps in certain terrains that Arma does not model in the stock game. Additionally, the Ifrit falls prey to higher-caliber weapons typically found in mods while the Hunter has too much of a vertical profile.

The Strider's engine is behind the driver, which helps against potential convoy ambushes that may seek to eliminate the engine to decisively stop the vehicle.

[stuv101]

V. Berlioz の投稿を引用：

Strider is the best all-around thanks to its ability to go on water, which helps in certain terrains that Arma does not model in the stock game. Additionally, the Ifrit falls prey to higher-caliber weapons typically found in mods while the Hunter has too much of a vertical profile.

The Strider's engine is behind the driver, which helps against potential convoy ambushes that may seek to eliminate the engine to decisively stop the vehicle.

Some things you might want to consider about the Strider:

1. The Strider can't withstand an RPG-7 to the sides or rear (especially the back left side), it will explode. Both the Hunter and Ifrit survive RPG-7s from all sides.
   
   
2. Where the Hunter has better hull armor and the Ifrit has sloped armor (in the front anyway), the Strider doesn't utilize either, it's small arms protection is terrible (seriously, all it takes is any 7.62 marksman rifle or autorifle to start killing crew members). It's defense is in its manuverability and compact form; out manuvering threats and hiding behind cover that both the Hunter and Ifrit would be exposed behind.

[El Berl]

-hg- stuv101 の投稿を引用：

V. Berlioz の投稿を引用：

Strider is the best all-around thanks to its ability to go on water, which helps in certain terrains that Arma does not model in the stock game. Additionally, the Ifrit falls prey to higher-caliber weapons typically found in mods while the Hunter has too much of a vertical profile.

The Strider's engine is behind the driver, which helps against potential convoy ambushes that may seek to eliminate the engine to decisively stop the vehicle.

Some things you might want to consider about the Strider:

1. The Strider can't withstand an RPG-7 to the sides or rear (especially the back left side), it will explode. Both the Hunter and Ifrit survive RPG-7s from all sides.
   
   
2. Where the Hunter has better hull armor and the Ifrit has sloped armor (in the front anyway), the Strider doesn't utilize either, it's small arms protection is terrible (seriously, all it takes is any 7.62 marksman rifle or autorifle to start killing crew members). It's defense is in its manuverability and compact form; out manuvering threats and hiding behind cover that both the Hunter and Ifrit would be exposed behind.

All true, but I believe the lower profile makes up for its faults. The hunter just sits too high for me and it is at a greater risk of flipping because of it.

[stuv101]

V. Berlioz の投稿を引用：

All true, but I believe the lower profile makes up for its faults. The hunter just sits too high for me and it is at a greater risk of flipping because of it.

Fair enough.
Personally, from experience, i'll take a Hunter anyday; I've been sprayed down in Striders enough times to just not feel safe in them.

I haven't experienced to many misfortunate events in Ifrits