Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Probably not. Their workstations are going to be bog-standard HP Enterprise trash because HP won the ACES contract to handle their normal IT: https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/dec/HQ_C10-080_ACES.html
Their laptops are all IBM Thinkpads, which again are not gaming-centric at all.
The only thing NASA has are things like the Pleiades Supercomputer, which doesn't even have any GPUs in it. It's just a ton of CPU cores, gobs of memory and a huge clustered data storage and runs on Linux.
In all likelihood, nearly everyone playing A3 already has a better PC than the average NASA PC when it comes to gaming because most of them probably don't even have discreet GPUs and the ones they do have are Quadro/FirePro professional-class GPUs that are good at compute and suck at real-time rendering.
I recall the National Reconnaissance Office has technology 20-30 years ahead of NASA. I wonder if they can fix the AI...
Let me guess... the moon landing was a hoax, right?
The Moon Landing is filmed before a live studio audience *cues catchy 90s intro*