Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
TL;DR: a 8700K clocked at 5 GHz with watercooling is the best deal for ArmA 3 currently.
To what extent of liquid cooling would I need? Will it be so intensive on the computer that I will need to delid the cpu to keep it under control?
It depends from the temps you are hitting, a very good air cooler could also hit a stable 5 GHz or close to that.
I believe it’s an engine limitation as to why single-core performance with a quad core setup is so optimal for arma 3. I asked about the performance of the TR1950X because I do want to get into content creation and streaming which the TR1950X excelled at. However, the optimization for these high core count CPUs for Arma 3 are lacking and will most likely never change due to the nature of Real Virtuality 4 and most likely Enfusion won’t have extensive multi-core performance options either. We can only hope Bohemia rework Enfusion for Ryzen users to play Arma 3 without the severe hindrances Ryzen users are experiencing in this game.