Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Ez a téma zárolásra került 
Hozzászólási szabályok és irányelvek
Hozzászólás jelentése
You should be careful calling somebody else a lunatic when you are using Orwellian Newspeak unironically.
Here's something for you to mull over: You probably don't like stepping into $hit. Does that mean you are suffering from a phobia?
It is the oldest trick in the communist playbook to ascribe a mental illness to your political opponent. The mental asylums in the Soviet Union were as filled as the Gulags were.
People believe what they do, but does that mean I DON'T honestly think they are stupid sometimes? No, don't lie and say that out in the open then just to appear a certain way yourself out in the open. You can go ahead and though lie to yourself and others who are gullible and naive enough to believe that it means ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ to tell someone they can believe what they can believe, like anyone ever stopped them? You are just giving anyone more credit than they deserve then when it's just them singing their sorrowful song about people not letting them believe things. No one is stopping anyone from believing anything and don't try to imply like they do or something because people randomly blurt it out in a crying fallacious protest when they get challenged in any way, often hypocritically after they freely express their view but then deem others to be inappropriate somehow. No one is stopping anyone from believing anything but that doesn't mean it's not stupid. But the more someone claims otherwise and says people are stopping them from believing something, the bigger distraction and fallacy it is away from the issue.
Many folks need to hide their real honest views from out in the open like this, and only express them behind closed doors confiding to their similar-minded friends. Of course this depends on your views themselves, obviously bigoted people have to hide their honest real views out in the open more naturally. These people need to restrict their own honest expressions more often and must run off to fringe settings to mostly only discuss some things with people who only agree with them, otherwise they have very little rational substance to work with in a neutral setting..
Speaking of NAK, I had a bad experience with the idiots and don't care one way or the other if many of them are more liberal/progressive types. But I highly doubt that (how it is described and implied here anyway), and most of them, many of the regulars at least are surely just like many of you Trumpie troopers.
Edited to coddle the Trumpies..
So what ever happened to Rick Gates, Paul Manafort, Dutch lawyer that worked with Manafort, Michael Flynn, George Papadopolis or however you spell it, and Roger Stone and the other guy? Hmmmmmm.
Jared Kushner must've been very disappointed when he got off the phone with wikileaks and they said they couldn't get the, nonexistent possible dirt on Hillary they said they would so just leaking the DNC emails in a timely and strategic manner was good enough, it was effective also at helping to convince disenfranchised (exclusive) Bernie supporters from voting, or not voting for Hillary and wasting it on a 3rd party or even Trump somehow God forbid. I guess people who that applies to didn't even have a real clue as to why they'd even vote for Bernie despite that being agreeable in my view, some folks just can't be helped and are clueless about everything though and go figure why Trump got elected then.
Now go look up how it's obvious to conclude that Trump knew about Wikileaks and everything from the start. Somehow magically though he didn't know and everyone working for him knew ect. Sure bruhs.
Now go look up how Mueller just confirmed that it's possible that Trump can get indicted after he leaves office and they chose not to make the decision whether or not to only because of it being about the president.
Now go look up how they need to document explicit communications between people to prove certain things, like collusion ect. And the fact is they just didn't get cooperation from a lot of witnesses and participants, thus why some of them got jailed. Just because they didn't prove something officially doesn't mean anything relating to the initial suspicion is untrue or that it is even untrue anyway technically and it still happened without getting caught. Obviously it was not a simple matter and there were many lawyers and other people involved with it. Some folks have a very kooky logic where they will dismiss things very rapidly only to distract away from the broader issue at hand, ignoring any objective facts that prove them wrong about from before.
People grow very insecure politically when they get proven wrong about something over time and so they need to resort to distracting, denying, ect. What else is new? So they have to create these fallacies to distract and deny. Some (many) peoples entire political existence is based on it.
So regardless anyway it's the type of thing where they acknowledged about them being helped and nudging and winking all the time, the Russians worked to get Trump elected. So sure they "sowed discord", in their efforts to elect and help the Trump campaign regardless of whether there was some formal agreement or collusion or explicit coordination. I guess people are that stupid and quick to think even this aspect of it all is not like how it actually is. It's obvious that Trump has been sucking Putin's ♥♥♥♥ the whole time and it makes us wonder if they have some pee-pee tape or something of Trump.
However, if you think you can diagnose individuals or even large swaths of people alltogether with a mental illness because they use a slur or don't like something that you like, you are either:
1. Mentally insane. Maybe ask a doctor why the diagnosis you gave is completely invalid and irrational.
2. Know exactly what you are doing and are therefor intellectually dishonest.
3. Just dumb, because you don't understand the words you are using and are just repeating the latest party line, devoid of any reflection and original thought.
The last option is probably the case most of the time. I'll show you why it is dumb: Because it doesn't even fit the rest of what you people usually spew: If you assume that someone is saying what he is saying because of a mental defect, then he can not at the same time be evil or a bigot, at least not in so far.
It is also highly discrimatory to then sanction someone because of that, by banning him from a forum for example. I thought you people are against discrimination?
But I tell you why your office of propaganda nonetheless has issued this term: Because the point is not to diagnose an illness, the point is to create buzzwords to be used by dumb people and NOT HAVING TO DEBATE THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
You should, in fact, be glad I'm pointing this out and totally agree with me hereto, because even in the most totalitarian systems as far as I know, homosexuals were only ever locked up - or otherwise sanctioned - on either of two grounds:
- Either because the system had penal laws against homosexual interaction and they were found to be or accused of breaking the law, OR
- Homosexuality was declared a mental disorder and they went to a hospital or a camp.
So, nonchalantly tossing around armchair medical diagnoses based on what is currently politically en vouge, while deluding yourself to stand on morally superior ground - or even safe ground - should be the last thing you people are doing. But then again, I wouldn't have to explain this to you if point 3 above wouldn't be in effect most of the time.
The very fact that our language(s) are currently being brutally r4ped - especially by your crowd - to arbitrarily change definitions, invent new words, new pronouns etc to fit political propaganda is the single worst thing that can happen. Because language is probably the most important practical difference between humans and beasts. If you arbitrarily change language, especially for political purposes and between political lines, communication is getting corrupted to the point where you will have two or more political camps where sensible communication between the camps becomes impossible. I leave it to your fantasy what happens next.
You’re wasting your lives.
MAGA!
But they can't afford the set of testicles and a spine. Patreon ain't rolling in the bucks like it used to!
Oh. That’s a lot of typing.
Could be very interesting though;