is new world better than throne and liberty?

[IReportWhoDontHelp]

im asking because both games are from amazon and mmorpgs

[Purromi]

Amazon only publish Throne and liberty and not creating it. Throne and liberty way more of P2W but seems better but less solo and more mmorpg where you need guild. All of stuff in throne and liberty in end-game is about PVP and PVE is just small part of the end-game.

[O.K]

new world unfinished game and you are getting 1 content update maybe once a year
TL unfinished game but you are getting 1 content update every few months
pick your poision

[Teladi]

Yes, it is better.

NW lacks of real leadership, but the combat is the best of all current mmos.

[Litva]

Originally posted by BadConnection:

im asking because both games are from amazon and mmorpgs

Both sucks actually now in the end.
Ashes of creation is our last hope.

[EazyLee]

In my opinion new world is better by a long shot... Throne and Liberty isnt very good

[Dogtatokun]

Neither are good. But T&L is bad while NW is terrible.

[Profilerz]

I agree with most opinion's here. Neither game is very good. I have 100's of hours in both. T&L has more mmo feel with community/guilds etc. New world has better combat but once you get to the end game and spend a week or so farming all the artifacts there really isn't much to do except repeat the same opr or gorgon raid.

[ocamiac]

New World is great; the support and communication are pretty bad... And if you play 1.000h+ you might feel a lack of content and they are pretty slow with new content in the last 1,5 years...
But its still a great game. Casuals will have no problems with the amount of endgame content and if you are a patient player, you will be fine, too.
I have more than 3k hours in this game and I know quite a lot of other players with 3k to 10k hours... :)

[Lexinator]

I have hundreds of hours in both, but only play New World. That should tell you all you need to know.

[Dogtatokun]

No. New World is in a constant decline. T&L's future is yet to be seen.

[Tomi]

Originally posted by Teladi:

Yes, it is better.

NW lacks of real leadership, but the combat is the best of all current mmos.

Saying nw has the best Combat is literally crazy. It's clunky af.

If you want good combat play lost ARK, GW2 or wow everything else bs in terms of combat

[Lexinator]

Originally posted by Tomi:

Originally posted by Teladi:

Yes, it is better.

NW lacks of real leadership, but the combat is the best of all current mmos.

Saying nw has the best Combat is literally crazy. It's clunky af.

If you want good combat play lost ARK, GW2 or wow everything else bs in terms of combat

Lol. GW2? Lol. Thanks for the laugh.

[Dogtatokun]

Originally posted by Lexinator:

Originally posted by Tomi:

Saying nw has the best Combat is literally crazy. It's clunky af.

If you want good combat play lost ARK, GW2 or wow everything else bs in terms of combat

Lol. GW2? Lol. Thanks for the laugh.

Because 3 skills per weapon is total good combat. Tera did it better.

[Gilver]

Originally posted by Litva:

Originally posted by BadConnection:

im asking because both games are from amazon and mmorpgs

Both sucks actually now in the end.
Ashes of creation is our last hope.

of course it is....its the same vibe as the 4 Last Chance that Blizzard with Diablo4 had

[yveH]

Originally posted by Lexinator:

I have hundreds of hours in both, but only play New World. That should tell you all you need to know.

That you like terrible games?