Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
You have a CPU bottleneck
I think if have option to drag that all grass down probably is smoother gameplay.
8 cores cpu without HT is way bigger loss its optimal in current games but in few years its get even worse bit. They put recommended so minimal what can run maybe 60fps not all today use anymore 60hz screens. These lowest specs can run playable but its something how playable it is.
https://youtu.be/zcaXD1c8Jeg
Technical test felt a lot smoother. I was pleased.
It's not like there aren't good cpus..the problem is cryengine as a base, that's really bad when it comes to using multiple cores. No wonder performance is bad. lol
Higher Clocks and Threads per Core is more important than number of Cores, yeah.
yea i tried running this game with my 7 years old toaster and it work flawlessly.
40-60 fps depends where I'm in town, fighting or chilling on the beach.
Of course my GPU 99%, CPU 40% ish