Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
GTX 960 2GB
AMD 3600
16GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz
But if I'm out in the wild and expecting a fight or just doing some bow shooting, I'll switch the graphics settings back to low because it gets me 100-120 FPS and that makes a huge difference if you're shooting.
I don't really understand what the fuss is about 60FPS. It's no better than 50 and is pretty much garbage for an action game, especially if you're going to shoot anything, be it a bow or gun.
The graphics look plenty good enough on low. So if you have to play on low, don't worry about it, it looks fine.
I have 1080ti and am running at 3440x1440. I think the game runs pretty well on this older GPU I'm still using.
The amount of vRAM is probably going to matter if you're going to try running on max graphics. I have 11 and get 30-50 FPS on max settings. Not good enough for shooting, but otherwise still OK.
I have an ancient i7 CPU, I'm actually thinking about donating it to a museum and buy a new one. But the game runs fine with that CPU.
The CPU on the other hand, especially in towns, ramps up a few threads so much that they cap out, which is *usually* a Indicator for a very big cpu bottleneck in that specific game.
( https://i.imgur.com/F3rY9vY.png - CPU load by thread according to Windows)
Considering that even my 9900k is dropping to the low 40ish fps in towns, Intel 4th gen is likely to be really limiting there I assume.
Sadly, it will likely never change. I doubt the Devs will address it the same way they denied having anything to do with blowing up 3090's.
I have a 1660S asus.
I run terrain, textures, objects @ very high, everything else medium. 1080p. cap FPS to 30, I could cap FPS to 60 but then my PC gets around 70 degrees and I'd rather keep it cooler.
( My load In and outside of towns, still 9900k/3070 @ 1440p):
https://i.imgur.com/o9xAotf.png
I'll let you guys know when I find a setting which reduces the load on the CPU, If there is one, it should be really improving FPS on older CPUs (paired with proper GPUs, of course) and in towns for most people with newer rigs.
one of the settings that helps is actually nameplates being lowered.
I actually tried it but sadly didn't notice any mayor improvements.
I was able to get the config file narrowed down (/appdata/AGS/New world/savedata), but didn't find any extra settings in there, tho they may need to be added manually, I hit up amazongames's support, asking for any extra settings we may be able to change in the config file to reduce specifically CPU load.