Phantasy Star Online 2 New Genesis

Phantasy Star Online 2 New Genesis

檢視統計資料:
此主題已被鎖定
X Lord X 2020 年 8 月 5 日 上午 5:35
Thank you Sega for not allowing people to make child like characters
As a sane, and normal human here, i for one am extremely happy that Sega are not catering towards the shadier members of society.

Sure there are a few legit players that like to play as small characters for role play reasons, but they are in the minority. I find it totally baffling the amount of creepy people that write walls of texts getting triggered that Sega are not allowing the POTENTIAL for pedophilic avatars in their games.

Those who agree with me, thank you, you are a decent human being.

Those who have not played this game before also, you will quickly notice there is a very creepy audience that play it generally, you will often stumble upon fury avatars grinding with eachother in the lobbies and other areas, 99% of the playerbase are female avatars dressed in skimpy clothing etc. Yet ironically 99% of the people that are roleplaying sexual fantasies with eachother are all men LOL.

Just be warned that if you are not into that kind of thing, it will shock you at how seriously people try to live their RL lives through this game. It is basically a cosplay social simulator akin to Second Life. The gameplay is secondary
最後修改者:X Lord X; 2020 年 8 月 5 日 上午 5:36
引用自 Karnage:
引用自 Zennie
引用自 Nevzat

Wrong, it is actually illegal in many countries, even anime/drawings etc. (Which IS the reason why Sega has complied with THE LAW.)
but like, blade an soul has lolis, and they dress skimpy. are you going to tell me NCWest is breaking the law? how about Tara Online? Is Blue Hole breaking the law too?
Children existing isn't illegal, nor are children being skimpy. The issue is that PSO2 allows you to do things that other games don't that directly violate US law. For example, the laws related to CP include masochism. That means that emotes like the recent KonoSuba one in which your character takes sexual pleasure from being physically beaten by sentient cabbages would violate this law if done on a child character. The laws also include general obscenity.

The most important thing about the law is that it states that these acts merely need to be simulated. Which means that anything sexual or obscene doesn't actually need to happen to the character is question. It would just have to appear that such acts are being done against them. So in other words, these loli characters existing aren't illegal. It's what you can do with them specifically in PSO2 that could violate US law.

Keep in mind that a US court has already charged a person for possessing drawn loli hentai in the US. A legal precedent has been set and the courts ruling has never been undone or challenged. Even Japan is starting to crack down on loli/shota within recent years.
< >
目前顯示第 526-540 則留言,共 920
Sneazel 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:30 
引用自 treos100

censorship has no "good reasons".

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.

Factually incorrect. The law you're talking about uses the terminology "INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM AN ACTUAL MINOR- THAT EXISTS" for good reason. The law people keep citing and talking about- does... in NO WAY... cover art. There are OTHER LAWS for that(none of which would even come close to being an issue for PSO2). So stop bringing the CP law into this.

Source: Literally have asked judges about this and they affirm the context doesn't mean what you think it means. It's there for a reason- stop ignoring entire the terminology. Thanks
最後修改者:Sneazel; 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:31
Danknight 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:30 
引用自 treos100
引用自 Sinistar

So... you are okay with what could be done if they didn't adjust the height slider?
they do not exist irl. no one is harmed by them or in their creation. it is a harmless video game character!

it is none of my business what other people do or do not like or are interested in nor do i make it my business to know.

the ONLY time something like this is, and should be, a problem is if it involves irl living breathing minors. that's it. end of discussion. there's nothing else to BE said about it!.

Absolutely disgusting.
Sinistar 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:31 
引用自 treos100

censorship has no "good reasons".

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.


The hilarious part is if you check anyone's profile here upset over the height change. All their games / screen shots / profile ♥♥♥♥ is nothing but lolis.
Danknight 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:34 
引用自 Sneazel

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.

Factually incorrect. The law you're talking about uses the terminology "INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM AN ACTUAL MINOR- THAT EXISTS" for good reason. The law people keep citing and talking about- does... in NO WAY... cover art. There are OTHER LAWS for that(none of which would even come close to being an issue for PSO2). So stop bringing the CP law into this.

Source: Literally have asked judges about this and they affirm the context doesn't mean what you think it means. It's there for a reason- stop ignoring entire the terminology. Thanks

You've asked judges if you can freely look at sexual, underaged "art"?

You don't see anything wrong with that?

There are so many things I'd like to say, but it's not worth the ban.
IceHedge 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:34 
引用自 Sinistar

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.


The hilarious part is if you check anyone's profile here upset over the height change. All their games / screen shots / profile ♥♥♥♥ is nothing but lolis.
BuT iT'S jUsT pIxElS!!!

So are photos of real things. :steamfacepalm:
SleeprunnerInc 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:37 
引用自 treos100

censorship has no "good reasons".

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.
In that case, shooting creatures, people and using weapons is a gateway for a child to become a mass murderer.

Do you agree on this?
Sneazel 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:37 
引用自 Sneazel

Factually incorrect. The law you're talking about uses the terminology "INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM AN ACTUAL MINOR- THAT EXISTS" for good reason. The law people keep citing and talking about- does... in NO WAY... cover art. There are OTHER LAWS for that(none of which would even come close to being an issue for PSO2). So stop bringing the CP law into this.

Source: Literally have asked judges about this and they affirm the context doesn't mean what you think it means. It's there for a reason- stop ignoring entire the terminology. Thanks

You've asked judges if you can freely look at sexual, underaged "art"?

You don't see anything wrong with that?

There are so many things I'd like to say, but it's not worth the ban.

I've asked a judge if the CP law pertains to artistic expression and fictional artworks.
It does not.

Your quotations show your bias. Luckily- Art is subjective. CP is not- and neither is the law regarding it.
Dex 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:40 
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
引用自 Dex

Ok, i'll play along. Where did I call you a pedophile? I don't generally delete my posts and I don't remember calling you one.
I actually went through yer post history and only once did you insinuate someone being a pedo BUT I will take it that you ment it as a joke. Post number 145 at https://steamcommunity.com/app/1056640/discussions/0/2794999486595053876/?ctp=10#c2798377275380380743

lol, you got me :)
SleeprunnerInc 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:41 
引用自 Dex
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
I actually went through yer post history and only once did you insinuate someone being a pedo BUT I will take it that you ment it as a joke. Post number 145 at https://steamcommunity.com/app/1056640/discussions/0/2794999486595053876/?ctp=10#c2798377275380380743

lol, you got me :)
Honestly, I do tend to check people's posts every now and then.

Yer clean as far as I am concerned since I can see that being a joke.
SleeprunnerInc 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:48 
引用自 Sinistar
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
That actually reminds me that there's some disclaimer that long as you aren't promoting it as CP and you explicitly claim and notify beforehand that each character is a fully grown adult and depicted as such, that they can look like young people which is apparently fine according to the law.

"She's actually 1000 years old so it is okay!"

It is a pretty good excuse yeah.
I mean you want a perfectly good example?

All the pornstars who are very short and do actual pornography.

And all their porn movies are totally legal.

It's a huge gray area and hard to define if it's actually illegal or not which is why you don't actually hear much of these incidents.

Plus if I ain't wrong, correct me if I am, the two example cases on the wikipedia article of the ACT and CP, the people had been previously charged with other stuff aswell.
Danknight 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:50 
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
I never anticipated to change anyone's mind, but I've at the very least managed to get these disgusting creatures to publicly admit they're okay with the sexualization of children :manthinking:
Could you answer the question.

引用自 SleeprunnerInc

I don't expect you to understand this, but that is completely false.The possession of underage porn is illegal because it creates a market that exploits children and is a gateway to more direct sexual abuse of minors. Do you think underage porn shouldn't be censored as well? Your argument sure seems that way.

Lolis, despite being virtual, are similarly a gateway for the sexual exploitation of minors and is illegal in the US for this reason. It enables pedophilia.

It's crazy that this needs to be explained during a time when an elite child sex trafficking ring is being unraveled as we speak. It's even crazier that you somehow think people who bring attention to this pedophilia are the actual pedos.
In that case, shooting creatures, people and using weapons is a gateway for a child to become a mass murderer.

Do you agree on this?

Straw man. Child porn isn't illegal because it depicts a crime being committed. Child porn is illegal because its consumption promotes the act. People don't commit crimes like murder or theft with the sole intent of distributing media of said crime.
SleeprunnerInc 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:52 
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
Could you answer the question.

引用自 SleeprunnerInc
In that case, shooting creatures, people and using weapons is a gateway for a child to become a mass murderer.

Do you agree on this?

Straw man. Child porn isn't illegal because it depicts a crime being committed. Child porn is illegal because its consumption promotes the act. People don't commit crimes like murder or theft with the sole intent of distributing media of said crime.
Counter argument, Isis and pretty much a major part of gangs.

There's a website where said videos are being released quite often and there's an actual thing called WAR TOURISM where people go to watch war IRL.

Oh and youtube is full of these videos too, they just get removed pretty fast.

So it's not a strawman.

It's a perfectly legit example of how the GATEWAY argument doesnt' work.
Danknight 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:53 
引用自 Sneazel

You've asked judges if you can freely look at sexual, underaged "art"?

You don't see anything wrong with that?

There are so many things I'd like to say, but it's not worth the ban.

I've asked a judge if the CP law pertains to artistic expression and fictional artworks.
It does not.

Your quotations show your bias. Luckily- Art is subjective. CP is not- and neither is the law regarding it.

You and this "judge" are wrong. It might not be apply under CP law, but it is still illegal nonetheless.

"Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene."
Sneazel 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:53 
引用自 SleeprunnerInc
Could you answer the question.

引用自 SleeprunnerInc
In that case, shooting creatures, people and using weapons is a gateway for a child to become a mass murderer.

Do you agree on this?

Straw man. Child porn isn't illegal because it depicts a crime being committed. Child porn is illegal because its consumption promotes the act. People don't commit crimes like murder or theft with the sole intent of distributing media of said crime.

Also PSO2 has nothing to do with CP. Since CP doesn't cover art. Please read the law you are trying to cite.

Also still waiting on prior citation.
Sylphie Fioré 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:53 
I think we all know the internet is a weird place and people do bad things on it, sure while I hope that actual pedos would be a minority and less of an issue, sadly, that is not always the case. There is no way to know unless something happens but I've seen plenty screwed up people on games and discords/gaming communities. Personally I think censorship is bad in general but I think that there are some exceptions like the height slider to combat child like characters and people being creepy with such. Maybe it would turn out ok but I'm not fond of child like characters running about when most players are grown adults, I just find it weird.

I'm playing FF14 right now and I've seen plenty lalafells doing things they shouldn't. The age of them matters not, they look child like and its creepy when they do or say anything adult. I wish I could unsee the internet sometimes.
最後修改者:Sylphie Fioré; 2020 年 8 月 13 日 上午 11:54
< >
目前顯示第 526-540 則留言,共 920
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2020 年 8 月 5 日 上午 5:35
回覆: 920