Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
@Entity's ♥♥♥♥♥: Hard to say as two games are never exactly the same. You might find someone that put you off and feel missing in this other game. For what it worth I had a good time with the two games and they share the same "influenced" by River City Ransom feel (RCG being an official spin-off). 😃
EDIT: it's actually the other way around, SPVTW's stores were instead inspired in the original River City Ransom. River City Girls still likely took some inspiration on SPVTW but definitely not that part.
Well, I stand corrected then!
It's kinda weird that I had a NES-compatible console when I was a kid but I never got to play the original River City Ransom.
Forget what I said, then, it's definitely the other way around.
Not only that but people who PAID for it can't legally obtain a copy either if they deleted it from their consoles after certain date.
I'm all against piracy, but sometimes companies leave players no other choice.
You just can't play Scott Pilgrim otherwise. Period.
That's exactly why I loved Scott Pilgrim VTW so much. But like RCG I was expecting something more systemic rather than a somewhat linear experience. But with such visual style (these animations, damn), I can understand that these companies played it "safe" on the system-side.