Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Some clarification needed here.
I'm not absolutely saying that it was cut, I was just offering that up as the most likely possibility. To tell the truth, there's a lot of reasons why content can be cut from a game. Perhaps the devs decided it didn't fit, or maybe the execs at EA didn't like it, or maybe there was a time constraint. Problem is, it's all conjecture at this point, as the devs went under.
As to the example you gave, Capcom actually did have permission to put Gut's and Griffith's armor and weapons in the console version of Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen. But when the game was ported to PC, they weren't able to get permission to use them again. So it was a copyright issue, but not that kind of copyright issue.