安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
let spies use theirs masquerade. I think that they should be forced to avoid airblast sentry the same way as they already avoid usual sentries. At the other hand, IMHO airblast sentry must juggle people to protect team base facilities and existing buildings from scouts, soldiers and pyros. Otherwise it could be applied only for rocket defence. It seems a little bit.. hm.. uninteresting.
IMHO introducing airblast sentry will make team to sacrifice one more engineer making him maintain airblast sentry and the other team will be forced to use spies and snipers more widely.
Cause now battle is often turned to rush and meat on many servers. People do the assault and dont pay proper attention for support classes.