Według 248 osób ta recenzja jest przydatna
Według 78 osób ta recenzja jest zabawna
Odradzane
0.0 godz. w ciągu ost. 2 tyg. / 248.9 godz. łącznie (31.6 godz. w momencie publikacji recenzji)
Zamieszczono 19 maja 2015 o 2:50
Zaktualizowano 19 maja 2015 o 3:06

Less of a review more of a warning.

Regardless of the 9s and 10s, this game is far from worth it. As well as the Steam reviews of people with a handful of hours praising it to be one of the best games of all time.

Suffers with massive performance issues. Graphics were clearly downgraded and are on par with the console versions, even at ultra. Yet you will struggle to maintain 40FPS on medium, even with higher end cards.

Vegetation is terribly done. Grass and small plants are static. Small trees and bushes are made entirely of light, and pass through Geralt with ease.

Game has many bugs and AI issues too.

It's clear not much effort was put into the game performance and visual-wise. Lack of optimisation makes the game far from worth the $60 asking price.

Developers lied about exploration too. Remember when they said "If you see it, you can go there"? Well... You can't. "No invisible walls" ring a bell? False too. Whilst they're not invisible walls, if you stray too far from the enclosed map, you get a warning that you've "reach the world's end" and must "turn back". If you fail to turn back, the map opens up and you must fast travel somewhere.

Do not trust CDPR. People always went on about Valve being for the gamer, and yet they aren't. The case is the same with CDPR.

Finally, to put things into perspective:
My rig:
i5 4690k
GTX 770 OC'd (2GB VRAM)
8 gigs of RAM, and all the rest.

I get 40 FPS at most with plenty of drops running on medium at 1080p. The game looks like something from 2013.

Disgusting.
Czy ta recenzja była przydatna? Tak Nie Zabawna Przyznaj nagrodę
Komentarzy: 106
<The J-Rock> [Wildin'] 28 stycznia 2022 o 1:30 
Nice potato you got there, poor Geralt .. lol
Etonas 24 czerwca 2020 o 11:32 
Awtism is real with this one.
Kazuma Kiryu 19 maja 2020 o 8:35 
i played this on 720p on a laptop barely even making it to 30 fps. I had no regrets. This was the best rpg ive ever played. You're a salty a-hole if you feel your gtx 770 couldnt hold upto it. imagine playing it on a geforce 920m.... Nevertheless i played it enjoyed the graphics even at 720p low settings, enjoyed the story.
Maybenotjoker 14 maja 2020 o 9:14 
You pc is just trash
Habbish 18 kwietnia 2020 o 14:12 
this is a performance issue, not a game issue, and the PC looks a lot better than console, i have both.
starwind3437 21 października 2018 o 13:47 
Thank you Kerbo for talking sense.
Kerbo 21 października 2018 o 11:58 
You really think a 770 is gonna hold that? Newsflash, the recommend specs change. They changed the graphics of this game a lot so that's probably why your fps is a little less
starwind3437 21 października 2018 o 6:19 
YOu stiill need to update your computer like almost everyone was saying.
Tumas Altaawus 21 października 2018 o 3:48 
Witcher 3 isn't one of "today's" AAA games, it released 3 1/2 years ago :)
starwind3437 20 października 2018 o 14:51 
Ok and...? As many other people have told you update your computer and you'll be fine. Your computer is out of for today's AAA games.