Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
However, I'm not sure it's very common for games to upgrade in such a way that people who could previously play suddenly can't. That would have to be a situation like, I dunno, they suddenly start using fancy shaders that rule out old cards, and they don't make it an optional feature. I've never experienced that happening to me, at least.
What's more common is games starting to run a bit worse. But they still run - you can still play the game. If the minimum requirement means, in part, that the game "runs okay", then you have to realise that's a subjective judgement. As such I don't think it's a good thing to make a legal claim over. Companies should still update their official requirements to their own subjective standards, of course, but I don't really think they should be forced to give you your money back if you get 15fps and you were hoping you'd get 30.
@Spawn of Totoro The agreements are very clear on this. The reality is obviously no. But I'm trying to gather peoples opinions. Like I said, "hypothetical" and "peoples feelings". For someone that read agreements, it sure seems like my post was too long for you to read.