Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Steam has barely any competition. In such situation they want to maximize profits, instead of giving free games and better deals than some minor underdogs.
But I'm sure it might be different if you don't look for mostly indie-ish games or AAA-stuff from about 2-3 years ago like I do.
Don't buy if not on sale. If it is not on sale, wait two weeks, it will be.
As for sales, IMO they're basically the same. Most titles max out at 75% off and only a small select few do 80% or more.
I think it's more that, when Steam started doing these sales, it was rather uncanny to see so many big titles (some which were rather new to the market) have such drastic discounts. Over time, we've become accustomed to it so it no longer seems like a big deal. And the competition from Greenman Gaming and Amazon is directly due to them trying to compete against Steam's sales. If it wasn't fro Steam forcing their hand, I doubt most other digital retailers would ever bother with providing such deep discounts.
I think their answer is probably, "We really don't see any problem."
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/valve-worth-3-billion-report/1100-6365049/
(Old article, but still a valid theory.)