Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
no issues for me. Im guessing you're on intel procs?
So far its intel owners who are effected, as i would expect as intel procs are single threaded power houses, but they lack the grunt of a multi threaded chip like the FX series (in a physics calculation the intel out performs FX, but in an actual video or audio production the FX eats the intel for breakfest).
Go actually makes use of all 8 of my FX cores near 90% each.
well intel cores are virtual cores aka not real physical cores. my FX proc has 8 real smaller cores that work together. Doesnt make the intel any weaker, it just means without a physical core it does more work virtually simulating the other cores of your intel proc.
which 4 core AMD? phenom? if a Phemon its the same issue as the intel, i beleive phenoms used virtual cores as well.
architecture dont care about the update. if the update at all asked the proc to work harder and the proc incapable of the task will cause performance issues aka a bottleneck.