Fallout

Fallout

Bethesda so greedy these days.
They can't accept the original fallout games and new vegas is better than Fallout 3 so t hey got to pull this stunt?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 315 comments
cheeks_B_clapped Mar 15, 2014 @ 2:00am 
I don't really understand people who argue that one Fallout game is better than another. After all, they are the same series! I mean, I do understand having a personal preference, but me, I love them all.

Fallout 1 & 2 are far more strategic and old school than Fallout 3 & NV. 3 and NV are far more shooty and faster-paced. They are pretty much dissimilar games, that each play differently. When I want to think and play out the story, I jump into the first 2 Fallouts (or Tactics). When I want to run around the Wasteland blowing people away and turning into a complete beast of a survivor, i pop in 3 or NV. They each serve a different role, and they each do well in that role.

tl;dr
All Fallouts are fun. At least in my opinion.

P.S. What stunt are you referring to? Your post is kinda vague.
Last edited by cheeks_B_clapped; Mar 15, 2014 @ 2:01am
New Vegas takes after Fallout 2's storyline while fallout 3 does not follow the storyline. Bethesda was like "Oh there were fallout spin offs but the fans have waited for a true sequel and fallout 3 is that sequel." When in reality fallout 3 is a spin off that has nothing to do with fallout 2.

New Vegas is the true sequel.
Incunabulum Mar 16, 2014 @ 6:39pm 
And all that still has *nothing* to do with why FO is not available for sale right now.
Vex Hilarius Mar 17, 2014 @ 5:51pm 
You do realize they took fallout 1 2 and tactics down just so they can fix them up. They own the games now if they were greedy they wouldnt take the games down just to take them down, that would loose them money.
Originally posted by Orgy Time:
You do realize they took fallout 1 2 and tactics down just so they can fix them up. They own the games now if they were greedy they wouldnt take the games down just to take them down, that would loose them money.

Fix them up? How?

They told all Fallout 2 modders to go ♥♥♥♥ themselves or they will put a ceist and desist order.
Vex Hilarius Mar 19, 2014 @ 5:25am 
Originally posted by Lord Tony:
Originally posted by Orgy Time:
You do realize they took fallout 1 2 and tactics down just so they can fix them up. They own the games now if they were greedy they wouldnt take the games down just to take them down, that would loose them money.

Fix them up? How?

They told all Fallout 2 modders to go ♥♥♥♥ themselves or they will put a ceist and desist order.

Thats what i heard. They are just removing interplays logos and putting theres in (supposedly) and will fix the color issues.

Will you link me the place where you found the ceist and desist order? i never heard of that.
Incunabulum Mar 20, 2014 @ 4:23pm 
Originally posted by Lord Tony:
Fix them up? How?

They told all Fallout 2 modders to go ♥♥♥♥ themselves or they will put a ceist and desist order.

Uhm, no they didn't.
AFTERtwo Mar 20, 2014 @ 8:31pm 
Originally posted by Incunabulum:

Uhm, no they didn't.
i heard the same thing man, not a modder of fo2 so i cant say firsthand...but it came through the grapevine ninja
Originally posted by Incunabulum:
Originally posted by Lord Tony:
Fix them up? How?

They told all Fallout 2 modders to go ♥♥♥♥ themselves or they will put a ceist and desist order.

Uhm, no they didn't.

http://www.nma-fallout.com/showthread.php?50282-Fallout-3-Van-Buren-(Spoilers!)&p=4004132&viewfull=1#post4004132
AFTERtwo Mar 20, 2014 @ 8:52pm 
lord tony just hit the light switch.
thanks for the link
I still find it funny how Bethesda claims fallout 3 is the true sequel everyone has been waiting for since Fallout 2 when in reality New Vegas is the true sequel to Fallout 2.
Vex Hilarius Mar 21, 2014 @ 11:28am 
Originally posted by Lord Tony:
I still find it funny how Bethesda claims fallout 3 is the true sequel everyone has been waiting for since Fallout 2 when in reality New Vegas is the true sequel to Fallout 2.

I love Fallout 3 but i do agree with you. New Vegas should have been called 3 since its in the same area. Fallout 3 should have been like the beginning to a new trilogy or something.
Well Fallout 4 is going to be in Boston and it doesn't take after Fallout 3.
Fidller™ Mar 24, 2014 @ 2:33am 
..................New Vegas is the closest to California...and has all the returning factions (NCR, BoS, Vipers etc) but still.....F3 take's place in 2277...NV in 2281 a 4 year diffrence....i think the reason they wanted to do F3 in DC is to make the Enclave return...also don't BS about F3.....or else Liam Neeson will find you
AFTERtwo Mar 24, 2014 @ 6:22pm 
Originally posted by Fidller 'Princess Zu Kenny':
Liam Neeson will find you
o_o don't turn around...he's right behind you...
< >
Showing 1-15 of 315 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 15, 2014 @ 12:21am
Posts: 315