Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский Лат. Ам.)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
@Caesar 99 Nah, WWII would have much more features, like a larger campaign map, more unit types, etc. A WWI game could come later.
Then follow that up with some broad uninformed generalization about WW1 vs WW2. Sensing a pattern.
You use an offensisve name to post with and belong to an even more offensive steam group.
Definitely a pattern. You've sufficiently self-identified so that no one will be left wondering whether to ever pay attention to you. And for that I thank you.
So you've nothing to get worked up about here.
Btw, I do find it a little amusing you refer to this as your forum though, nice touch. I can only assume you meant get off my thread, which is only slightly less amusing given you don't own it either.
Edited to add this suggestion on WW2: Play Combat Mission. No game will ever be created for that war that can touch it. It's not a game, it's a simulation.