M202 flash concept file :: RUNNING WITH RIFLES Modding Discussions

Store Page

RUNNING WITH RIFLES

All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

RUNNING WITH RIFLES > Modding Discussions > Topic Details

A kobold

Apr 9, 2015 @ 8:16pm

M202 flash concept file

Ok for anyone that doesn't Know I am warbrand2 I make weapons for this game then force them on teh devs which either add them or tell me to buzz off, depending on the weapon.

Today I finished a concept file for a weapon I am working on the M202 flash.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=422003078

Originally the concept was to be a heavy rare anti tank weapon, but do to the fact that well a rare anti tank weapon would end up being "to epic to use" I turned it into a rare anti infantry weapon.

Now where everyone else comes in. I need to balance this thing... and get a hud image for it. bellow is the test file. My request is simple for people to test out the weapon then give feed back on where it should be changed if at all.

{LINK REMOVED}

Note: this weapon will likely end up in the game.... I have been perfecting it for a while, and well I got a m107 and a golden deagle in the game think I can get this in.

Ok now for the stats.

the m202 flash for perposes of the game is a one use 4 shot launcher loaded with high explosive fragmentation rounds. this means that it doesn't do much to armored vehicles but will shred infantry.

The objective of the tests to determine if it is effective against infantry. Note right now it is set to a 3000 exp requirment for one, and 6,000 for two. IF it seems to easy to use or to hard please tell me I want this thing as refined as possible before I start bugging the devs with it again.

Also a note the file includes a mp7 custom of mine ignore that, it is jsut a fun secondary that I have been balance testing and wanting to get in as a easter egg weapon. Though I know taht will never happen. (the model included for a soldier isn't used.... ignore it, do not open it, just ignore it.)

< >

Showing 1-3 of 3 comments