Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I play both games and enemy tends to be uneven and lines can be easily broken
Plus there will be a lot of "renegade" generals as called in heroes and generals sending men into the fighting just to level up their commander
Basically you will have certain sectors so heavily fortified there are enough men to keep a battle going for 3 hours, and some sectors with barely any men at all
Like in one war a group of german generals got together a great lot of men, pushed deep into soviet territory, pulled a stalingrad and got surrounded and decimated
Never seen one
To succeed there you need to be in a clan or you will not know what your allies are doing, which is critical to strategic success
As i said most generals put all their men in one place, causing areas to be severely undefended and others impregnable
Trust me I have 200hrs in that game